SodaHead - concerned's Answers & Comments

Education and Political Ideology?

2009-11-21T00:52:44Z

Education and Political Ideology?
(US)

22 answers, +5 raves

Were you Home Schooled or did you go to Public School as a child and young adult? And what political ideology do you currently support?

concerned answered
Public School and Liberal.
and said : How about just public school and they need inprovement

Should the government tax cosmetic procedures like Botox, tummy tucks and liposuction to help pay for health care reform?

2009-11-21T00:37:00Z

Should the government tax cosmetic procedures like Botox, tummy tucks and liposuction to help pay for health care reform?
(US)

32 answers, +7 raves

Posted: 02:01 PM ET Senate Democrats are proposing a 5% excise tax on elective cosmetic procedures. FROM CNN's Jack Cafferty Something called "Botax" might help pay for health care reform. The name derives from a tax on Botox... which in the case of some Hollywood types could raise millions. Senate Democrats are proposing a 5% excise tax on elective cosmetic procedures... that includes things like Botox injections, breast implants, tummy tucks, face lifts, liposuction, teeth whitening, eyelid repairs, etc. The tax would bring in an estimated $6 billion over 10 years and wouldn't apply to cosmetic surgery meant to fix a deformity or injury. Drug makers and plastic surgeons think this is a terrible idea. The company that makes Botox calls it an "easy target" and says the tax is "unnecessarily punitive". The American Society of Plastic Surgeons says it will hurt countless American women of every income level - that it's not just a tax on "wealthy, suburban Republican women." They claim the tax would come at a particularly difficult economic time - when many women are trying to spruce up their looks as they search for jobs. I would offer that if you're out of work you probably wouldn't be getting Botox injections... but hey, what do I know? It could have been worse. Lobbyists apparently succeeded in persuading lawmakers to reduce the tax from 10%, which would have brought in $11 billion over a decade. Over the summer, many thought that Democrats weren't serious about the cosmetic surgery tax... but Harry Reid and Co. brought it back because they "needed money to make the bill work"."

concerned answered
Yes
and said : That shit is a Luxury hurry up and tax it

UnStimulated: Do you believe the White House's figures on jobs saved by Stimulus Spending?

2009-11-20T01:37:24Z

UnStimulated: Do you believe the White House's figures on jobs saved by Stimulus Spending?
(Business)

44 answers, +9 raves

The White House previously has slashed about 60,000 jobs from its previous report on jobs created because of Stimulus spending. The laughable "Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board" put out a report of unrealistic jobs that they slashed, including 5,000 jobs created by a $42,000 grant ($8.40 salary per job). The Board got pressured into revising these numbers because of its absurdity. But I suspect Stimulus spending got credit for tens of thousands of other jobs it did not create or "save." The government has an incentive to "fudge" the numbers because they control our money. If they don't use it well, we won't let them have it. They want to show improvement also to help steady our nerves and bring back confidence. Either way, I don't trust the numbers.

concerned answered
Faultess: I bow to the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board
and said : They can only report what each state sends in .. and that only means that the state Mccain is in sent in a wrong report .. and wrong districk .. but we are not surprised by anything that Mccain might try

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed: What do you expect will happen in the NYC civilian court trial of the September 11th terror attack mastermind?

2009-11-20T01:35:01Z

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed: What do you expect will happen in the NYC civilian court trial of the September 11th terror attack mastermind?
(US)

74 answers, +18 raves

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization, although he lived in Kuwait rather than Afghanistan, heading al-Qaeda's propaganda operations from sometime around 1999. According to the 9/11 Commission Report he was "the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks." He is also thought to have confessed to a role in many of the most significant terrorist plots over the last twenty years, including the World Trade Center 1993 bombings, the Operation Bojinka plot, an aborted 2002 attack on the U.S. Bank Tower in Los Angeles, the Bali nightclub bombings, the failed bombing of American Airlines Flight 63, the Millennium Plot, and the murder of Daniel Pearl.

concerned answered
Truthers answer here: Proof that George W Bush masterminded 9/11
and said : It would be nice if that happens .. but it will just be a trial ..

Should 0bama Be Tried In Military Court?

2009-11-20T01:30:33Z

Should 0bama Be Tried In Military Court?
(US)

273 answers, +68 raves

0bama has taken steps to sign away our sovereignty. This is, of course, an act of treason against the American people. However, 0bama isnt a natural born citizen of the U.S. Given all he has done to hurt this nation, shouldnt he be tried in a Military Court?

concerned answered
Undecided
and said : What did he do LOL

Barack Obama Bows to Japanese Emperor: Was the bow treacherous?

2009-11-20T01:16:26Z

Barack Obama Bows to Japanese Emperor: Was the bow treacherous?
(US)

59 answers, +4 raves

President Barack Obama's bow to Japanese Emperor Akihito has been criticized as treacherous, while others claim Obam's bow was humbling and not subservient, but a gesture of great respect. You can watch a video of Barack Obama's bow to the Japanese emperor and decide if Obama's gesture was inappropriate (see below) Barack Obama's bow to Emperor Akihito has been a hot debate considering Obama's history of deep, 90 degree bows. Obama's bows are peculiar as other leaders merely shake hands. To me, it seems like Obama bows 90 degrees because he is so much taller than say, the king of Saudi and the emperor of Japan. Here's a picture of Obama's bow to the Saudi king: And here's the video of Obama's bow to the Japanese emperor: Do you think President Barack Obama's bow to Japanese Emperor Akihito was inappropriate?

concerned answered
I think Barack Obama's bow to the Japanese Emperor...
and said : was out of resecpt .. but most republicans do not understand the difference between fear resecpt weak, .. becasue they can not even reconize their own fears .. and fear is truly a sign of weakness .. and republicans are truly a group of scared people .. they talk and teach fear all day every day .. scared of a trial in NY ,, scared of the terroist begin locked up in the states ... all that fear they have .. they can not see beyond it

Palin says Glenn Beck ‘clever,’ won’t rule out Palin-Beck ticket. Palin for President With Vice-President Glenn Beck. What would Happen in America if They Won?

2009-11-20T01:10:30Z

Palin says Glenn Beck ‘clever,’ won’t rule out Palin-Beck ticket. Palin for President With Vice-President Glenn Beck. What would Happen in America if They Won?
(US)

78 answers, +9 raves

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, asked whether she'd campaign with Fox News' personality Glenn Beck as her running mate, chuckled, but according to a conservative website, "wouldn't rule it out." "It's no secret that former GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin and Fox News host Glenn Beck share great respect and admiration -- so their fans can be forgiven for wondering: Is a 'dream ticket' of Palin-Beck ticket is completely out of the question?" Newsmax's David Patten wrote Tuesday night. "Perhaps not," he added. "Palin initially chuckled when Newsmax broached the idea," he continued. "But then she had some serious words of praise for the popular Fox personality." "I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, and I'm not there yet," Palin reportedly told Newsmax. "But Glenn Beck I have great respect for. He's a hoot. He gets his message across in such a clever way. And he's so bold – I have to respect that. He calls it like he sees it, and he's very, very, very effective."

concerned answered
None of the above
and said : Palin nor Glen will run for prez .. she is after money and he after rating

Why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed entitled to a presumption of innocence and all of the constitutional protections of a U.S. citizen?

2009-11-20T01:09:20Z

Why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed entitled to a presumption of innocence and all of the constitutional protections of a U.S. citizen?
(US)

14 answers, +2 raves

Is America at war, or not? Posted: November 16, 2009 6:50 pm Eastern © 2009 Are we at war – or not? For if we are at war, why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed headed for trial in federal court in the Southern District of New York? Why is he entitled to a presumption of innocence and all of the constitutional protections of a U.S. citizen? Is it possible we have done an injustice to this man by keeping him locked up all these years without trial? For that is what this trial implies – that he may not be guilty. And if we must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that KSM was complicit in mass murder, by what right do we send Predators and Special Forces to kill his al-Qaida comrades wherever we find them? For none of them has been granted a fair trial. When the Justice Department sets up a task force to wage war on a crime organization like the Mafia or MS-13, no U.S. official has a right to shoot Mafia or gang members on sight. No one has a right to bomb their homes. No one has a right to regard the possible death of their wives and children in an attack as acceptable collateral damage. A jaw-dropping expose on the six-month undercover operation that revealed the true terror-supporting nature of CAIR: "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." It's also available in electronic form at reduced price through Scribd. Yet that is what we do to al-Qaida, to which KSM belongs. We conduct those strikes in good conscience because we believe we are at war. But if we are at war, what is KSM doing in a U.S. court? Minoru Genda, who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, a naval base on U.S. soil, when America was at peace, and killed nearly as many Americans as the Sept. 11 hijackers, was not brought here for trial. He was an enemy combatant under the Geneva Conventions and treated as such. When Maj. Andre, the British spy and collaborator of Benedict Arnold, was captured, he got a military tribunal, after which he was hanged. When Gen. Andrew Jackson captured two British subjects in Spanish Florida aiding renegade Indians, Jackson had both tried and hanged on the spot. Enemy soldiers who commit atrocities are not sent to the United States for trial. Under the Geneva Conventions, soldiers who commit atrocities are shot when caught. When and where did Khalid Sheikh Mohammed acquire his right to a trial by a jury of his peers in a U.S. court? When John Wilkes Booth shot Abraham Lincoln, alleged collaborators like Mary Surratt were tried before a military tribunal and hanged at Fort McNair. When eight German saboteurs were caught in 1942 after being put ashore by U-boat, they were tried in secret before a military commission and executed, with the approval of the Supreme Court. What makes KSM special? Is the Obama administration aware of what it is risking by not turning KSM over to a military tribunal in Guantanamo? How does Justice handle a defense demand for a change of venue, far from lower Manhattan, where the jury pool was most deeply traumatized by Sept. 11? Would not KSM and his co-defendants, if a change of venue is denied, have a powerful argument for overturning any conviction on appeal? Were not KSM's Miranda rights impinged when he was not only not told he could have a lawyer on capture, but told that his family would be killed and he would be waterboarded if he refused to talk? And if all the evidence against the five defendants comes from other than their own testimony under duress, do not their lawyers have a right to know when, where, how and from whom Justice got the evidence to prosecute them? Does KSM have the right to confront all witnesses against him, even if they are al-Qaida turncoats or U.S. spies still transmitting information to U.S. intelligence? There have been reports that in the trials of those convicted in the first World Trade Center bombing, sources and methods were compromised, weakening our security for the second attack on Sept. 11. If the trial is held in lower Manhattan, how much security will be needed to protect against a car bomber who wants the world to see a mighty blow struck against the Great Satan? And if, as some suggest, the trial should be held on Governors Island, would that not make the United States look like a nation under siege? What do we do if the case against KSM is thrown out because the government refuses to reveal sources or methods, or if he gets a hung jury, or is acquitted, or has his conviction overturned? In America, trials often become games, where the prosecution, though it has truth on its side, loses because it inadvertently breaks one of the rules. The Obamaites had best pray that does not happen, for they may be betting his presidency on the outcome of the game about to begin. Pat Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the Reform Party's candidate in 2000. He is also a founder and editor of The American Conservative. Now a political analyst for MSNBC and a syndicated columnist, he served three presidents in the White House, was a founding panelist of three national TV shows, and is the author of seven books.

concerned answered

and said : because that is the type of system we have within the uSA and he should truly be tried by our own system .. if the republicans wanted a military trial they had 6 years to get one .. but they only wanted to hold people with nay trial becasue of their own self fears .. and fear is a very good sign of weakness

Why do conservatives have so little faith in the American Justice System

2009-11-17T02:09:39Z

Why do conservatives have so little faith in the American Justice System
(US)

31 answers, +11 raves

We have over 350 terrorists already on US Soil being held in US Prisons. We have held many terrorism trials. Following US law is not treason. What do you think, if in the remote possibility they are found not guilty they will be released to the streets of New York? They would be deported because they are foreign nationals. Good God, life must be so horrible for the right when they are so consumed with fear and hate. I think the mayor of New York Says it best. November 13, 2009 Categories: * New York Bloomberg: NYC terror trial is "fitting" Republicans from John McCain to John Boehner are complaining about the grave threats posed to Gotham by the Eric Holder's decision to hold Al Qaeda trials in New York -- but Mayor Mike Bloomberg says the city is ready, willing, able and unafraid. He said it's "fitting" the trials should take place a few blocks from the site of the attacks. Bloomberg, in a statement: “I support the Obama Administration’s decision to prosecute 9/11 terrorists here in New York. It is fitting that 9/11 suspects face justice near the World Trade Center site where so many New Yorkers were murdered. We have hosted terrorism trials before, including the trial of Omar Abdel-Rahman, the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. When I spoke to Attorney General Holder earlier today, I told him New York City stands ready to assist the federal court in the administration of justice in any way necessary. I have great confidence that the NYPD, with federal authorities, will handle security expertly. The NYPD is the best police department in the world and it has experience dealing with high-profile terrorism suspects and any logistical issues that may come up during the trials.”

concerned answered

and said : the republicnas know just how much dirt they have truly done .. but they should just get over it and release those photos and the truth becasue it can not be any worse than they treated a salve ..

Fort Hood and September 11th: Two Horrific Security Failures. Which Terrorist Events Outrages you more?

2009-11-14T17:55:51Z

Fort Hood and September 11th: Two Horrific Security Failures. Which Terrorist Events Outrages you more?
(US)

90 answers, +16 raves

America lost nearly 3,000 wonderful people on September 11, 2001 when over a dozen Islamist terrorists hijacked four planes and used them as suicide missiles. We lost 13 of our best, youngest on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood when an Islamist gunned down his fellow soldiers on American soil. I consider both of these tragedies acts of terrorism -- or at least part of the extremist Muslim war of Jihad against the West. (Insert disclaimer here that I know the difference between the average Muslim and the evil ones who want to kill non-Muslims*) Both of these events show flaws in our security systems, for which we depend on our government. Both events had warning signs. However, the Fort Hood shooting by ("alleged") US Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan had far more warning signs and shows a great breakdown in the post-9/11 security. We could have easily prevented the Fort Hood shootings. The US government knew that the murderer, Hasan, had over two dozen email exchanges with a known terrorist in Yemen. He also talked for an hour during a training to behead all non-believers and pour boiling water down their necks. He gave up wearing his uniform in exchange for Muslim garb. Hasan told fellow soldiers and blogged that he supported suicide bombers. Hasan also served on a security panel in April 2008. The George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute (HSPI) established the Presidential Transition Task Force, comprised of national and homeland security experts, policymakers and practitioners with the to determine the top strategic priorities to advance the nation’s security in the coming decade. http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjczMmJkNzZhNDE3OTI3... So, while the number of deaths and significance of September 11th far exceeds that of November 5th Fort Hood shooting, the opportunity to prevent Ft Hood far exceeded that of 9/11. And, the reasons for the failure indicate an ongoing problem, continued by statements from the Army's Chief of Staff, General Casey, Jr., who doesn't want to jump to conclusions about a murdering terrorist, but does want to jump to conclusions against the entire Army possibly harming the 0.25% of the Army population made up of Muslims. I don't give one bit of credibility to the talk of "pre-post traumatic stress disorder" and the stress he suffered from listening to horror stories. Why haven't we seen other psychologist over the past 50 years start shooting people up while yelling "Allah Akbar" ("God is Great" in Arabic)? Or the nurses and doctors at the military hospitals that see young boys with their legs blown off -- why don't they go on shooting rampages? I see this defense as malicious and a cover for the real threat -- that our government refuses to protect us because of political correctness. Security of Homeland Defense warned us about domestic terrorism from returning military personnel and Right Wing extremists -- well, she almost had it right except for everything but the "military" portion. And we've seen this "Sudden Jihadi Syndrome" in our military before. Hasan Akbar, a Muslin Sergeant in the US Army, threw a hand grenade into a tent with officers in Kuwait, killing two and wounding 14. Akbar, a convert, wrote in his diary before the attack, "Akbar wrote prior to the attack "I may not have killed any Muslims, but being in the Army is the same thing. I may have to make a choice very soon on who to kill." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassan_Akbar We've had enough warning signs. Let's start taking this seriously before more people die because of political correctness and cowardice on the part of our government to protect us.

concerned answered
September 11th still outrages me more
and said : 911 was a true terrosit attack .. where as Ft Hood was more a mental break down .. undetected .. which is the military's fault

Dan Pfeiffer Replaces Anita Dunn as White House Communications Director: Did Anita quit over the Fox News battle?

2009-11-14T17:53:44Z

Dan Pfeiffer Replaces Anita Dunn as White House Communications Director: Did Anita quit over the Fox News battle?
(US)

5 answers, 0 raves

Dan Pfeiffer will be replacing Anita Dunn as Anita steps down from her place as the White House communications director. The move will be the second time in 11 months that the White House communications director position has been turned over. Dan Pfeiffer is Anita Dunn's deputy. Pfeiffer served as President Barack Obama's traveling press secretary. Anita Dunn was reported by Fox News as the director who began the White House - Fox News battle. Do you think Anita Dunn is quitting because of the conflict between the White House and Fox News?

concerned answered
No, Anita Dunn is letting Dan Pfeiffer take her place for other reasons
and said : If nothing else she got FOX news on a better track .. becasue now they know they can not just but anything out there all the time .. that is why Bill and GLen are going on the road .. to tell their lies off the TV

Does Iran play a role in the Yemen conflict?

2009-11-14T17:50:26Z

Does Iran play a role in the Yemen conflict?
(World)

8 answers, +1 raves

Iran offered to take part in a "collective approach" to resolving an escalating Shiite rebellion in Yemen that has pulled Saudi Arabia into the fighting. But analysts cautioned that hostilities did not yet add up to a proxy regional conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

concerned answered

and said : Iran plays a part within all terroist attaks .. but at least Obaam has gotten futher alone with Iran than Bush ever did .. Iran will come alone when it has more of the UN against them ..

Shooter has yet to be charged or questioned!!!

2009-11-14T17:47:56Z

Shooter has yet to be charged or questioned!!!
(US)

18 answers, +3 raves

When other criminals commit a crime, they are charged and questioned immediately..They don't care if the person is half dead, they question them. What makes this muslim so special? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/...

concerned answered

and said : Our military ha sit's own court and laws .. so I am for sure they will take care of him after shooting his own men .. but he is not the first soilder to have a mental break down .. many of them that came back from Vietman did without treatment too .. and was adits too .. and this is not the first shooting on military grounds .. the military will handle it ..

What Will Obama Stuff His Bird With On This Thanksgiving Day?

2009-11-14T17:44:37Z

What Will Obama Stuff His Bird With On This Thanksgiving Day?
(US)

191 answers, +50 raves

Thanksgiving is almost here and as I think of things I am thankful for, I'm also mindful of things I've taken for granted as an American. Freedom, and all the liberties that come with it are so often not appreciated until they are threatened as they are now, IMO.

concerned answered
None of the above
and said : I hope he eats something other than a bird .. or it's stuffing .. LOL

Republican Baby Killers: How many abortions did your contributions to the Republican National Commitee pay for

2009-11-14T17:43:01Z

Republican Baby Killers: How many abortions did your contributions to the Republican National Commitee pay for
(US)

51 answers, +27 raves

I hate hypocrites and as a devout Roman Catholic I believe abortion is morally wrong. However I do not feel it is the Governments role to make it illegal. The religious need to do a better job convincing people it is wrong because even if it becomes illegal, they will stiil happen. Every once in awhile I come across a story so smelling of hypocrisy that it makes comment unnecessary. The news is a prime example of the guano loco logic of pathetic political posturing. I read this headline over at Poliitico:: The Republican National Committee’s health insurance plan covers elective abortion–a procedure the party’s own platform calls “a fundamental assault on innocent human life.” Federal Election Commission Records show the RNC purchases its insurance from Cigna. Two sales agents for the company said that the RNC’s policy covers elective abortion. I probably do not need to say it. But isn't amazing that the GOP which fought so vehemently to prevent mostly low-income women from having elective abortions covered by their government-subsidized health insurance, allows their own staff members to have the same procedure covered by their employer-based insurance. Is anyone surprised that Congress has such low approval ratings? No wonder they just lost two more seats in Congress. I wonder how many murders of the unborn your contributions to the Repulican Party paid for.

concerned answered

and said : Well while they are tring to out law abortion and stop incurance companies from paying for abortions .. they should also remove VIAGRA our insurnce companies nor tax dollars should pay for VIAGRA either ..

President Obama gives Japan's Emperor Akihito a wow bow. How low will he go?

2009-11-14T17:40:30Z

President Obama gives Japan's Emperor Akihito a wow bow. How low will he go?
(US)

42 answers, +6 raves

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/obama-empe... How low will the new American president go for the world's royalty? This photo will get Democrat President Obama a lot of approving nods in Japan this weekend, especially among the older generation of Japanese who still pay attention to the royal family living in its downtown castle. Very low bows like this are a sign of great respect and deference for a superior. To some in the United States, however, an upright handshake might have looked better. Remember Michelle Obama casually patting Britain's Queen Elizabeth on the back during their Buckingham Palace visit? America's royalty tends to make movies and get bad reviews and lots of money as a sign of respect.

concerned answered

and said : resecpt is something most whites do not understand .. they confusse resecpt with fear .. that is why they do not understand most people

Do you think some of the greedy rich few who have learned to basically buy elections in the United States of America are doing so in other countries as well?

2009-11-06T23:35:35Z

Do you think some of the greedy rich few who have learned to basically buy elections in the United States of America are doing so in other countries as well?
(US)

44 answers, +10 raves

Those who have participated in the discussions connected to my political polls here on SodaHead should probably know what I'm talking about already, but for those who don't... consider why it is that some people put so much money into BOTH of the parties that have any reasonable chance at winning in an election in the United States, and consider what the effect is on those elections when some of those same people pay others to slander the very candidates they are supporting financially. Okay, if I just lost you... please check out my older polls and come back here later. Otherwise, consider the question and think about whether or not it's likely that some of those who gain so much through controlling the elections in the United States of America may in fact have their hands in the rest of America as well. Not speculation on my part... I've already had to run for my life. I'm just curious if it's as unobvious as the people who want me dead seem to think it is... and either way, I just want to live my life in peace. If I get sent back to the USA and end up dead... you'll all have your answer. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that.

concerned answered
I don't know, but it would explain why some things work the way they do.
and said : yeah ,, but sometimes I feel like they placed Obama in office so they would have someone other than themself to blame for this bankrupt unemployed country .. But history tells us the republicans always seen things flopping like crazy .. they are so dam greedy it turns my stomach ... they only vote for things that always lead our tax dollars into the hands of corprationsand keep tring to make a job a part of our personal life .. it is just a job .. Now they are tring to stop healthcare or insurance reform from happening .. they have their plants everywhere .. well BUSH was spending time bankrupting this country they were quite or a mouse .. but oh now they have so much to say

What is a Blue Dog Democrat?

2009-11-06T03:07:17Z

What is a Blue Dog Democrat?
(US)

8 answers, +2 raves

concerned answered
Democrats who.......
and said : DEMS whom show up in name only they are fake DEMS

Why Does President Obama Want to Bring America to Her Knees? What is the Purpose of His Agenda to Bankrupt This Country?

2009-11-06T03:05:26Z

Why Does President Obama Want to Bring America to Her Knees? What is the Purpose of His Agenda to Bankrupt This Country?
(US)

32 answers, +14 raves

Alright, all you folks who believe President Obama is ruining this country, are asked to give me the reasons. Why? Why would a president of the world's greatest super power and most wonderful republic, ever, want to take her down? You whine incessantly that his agenda is to ruin this country, but I've never heard even an incoherent reason behind this. Start talking. I don't want to hear what your perceptions are of WHAT he is doing, I want to know WHY you think he's doing it. And just to make it a little more interesting, I don't want to hear about your "feelings" or what you've been told by others. I want to know your specific reasons as to his purpose. Facts are not optional.

concerned answered
This is exactly why.....
and said : BUSH Bankrupt this country .. and Obama has a large MOP tring to clean up his mess .. It took BUSh 8 years to bankrupt this country .. and unemploy everyone .. and now those republicans need to get a MOP and start helping clean up Bush's mess too

Is Rush Limbaugh's use of the terms "little man-child" president just racist code for the derogatory term boy? I do but what do you think.

2009-11-06T03:01:31Z

Is Rush Limbaugh's use of the terms "little man-child" president just racist code for the derogatory term boy? I do but what do you think.
(US)

99 answers, +27 raves

concerned answered

and said : RUSH is just over weight .. and calling some one little makes him feel good or that he is not over weight .. lol