This subject, more so than any other, has shown me how many conservatives have given up their right to think for themselves to be led around by pundits. Who in their right mind would let their access provider determine what content they can access?
On the flip side of this issue is this release by the EFF ( http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/... ). They make some very good points.
Truthfully, any FCC ruling should equate to ISP's can't determine last mile content access and the FCC won't determine anything else. Anything more than that makes me nervous.
Submit News News
Free Press Debunks Claims about Net Neutrality and Investment
- November 02, 2009 16:42:05
- Read all 6 comments
- +4 raves
- A new report by Free Press provides overwhelming evidence, despite the claims of companies like AT&T, that Network Neutrality will not harm network investment. On the contrary, the report shows that open Internet rules will likely have a positive impact on investment in both the network and applications markets....
Read full article »
Top Comment
You can't believe what they say, of course they'll say net neutrality is a good thing.
Their probably in on it.
It'll keep you from speaking your mind if you disagree with the leftest crazies.
The internet shouldn't be censored.
So on that note;
fuck Obama
fuck Mccain
fuck Pelosi
fuck Reed
fuck Bush
fuck everyone in the white house
and fuck you if you want to silece descent.
How come it was patriotic when Bush was in office, but now it's not?
Who thought this gem up?
On the flip side of this issue is this release by the EFF ( http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/... ). They make some very good points.
Truthfully, any FCC ruling should equate to ISP's can't determine last mile content access and the FCC won't determine anything else. Anything more than that makes me nervous.