-
Israel and the ‘Exodus’ Of America’s Wealth
Israel and the ‘Exodus’ Of America’s Wealth “And Yahweh said to Moses ‘Tell the Israelites that both men and women alike are to ask their Egyptian neighbors for all their silver and gold…’ And... Israel and the ‘Exodus’ Of America’s Wealth
“And Yahweh said to Moses ‘Tell the Israelites that both men and women alike are to ask their Egyptian neighbors for all their silver and gold…’ And so the Israelites did as instructed and asked the Egyptians to lend them all their gold and silver, which the Egyptians did, and the Israelites therefore plundered them…’
–The Book of Exodus
During George Bush’s recent visit to Israel to help celebrate 60 uninterrupted years of good, old-fashioned/Old Testament-type butchery and oppression against the non-Jewish peoples of the Holy Land (Christian and Muslim alike) he was promptly met by rabbis closely-associated with ultra-violent elements of the Israeli right (as opposed to the moderately-violent of the Israeli left) who presented him with a list of demands. The commandments, collectively called ‘Megillat Bush’ were written on a specially-made scroll as if scribed personally by some Old Testament prophet, giving it that old world/otherworldly/divine quality it otherwise would not have possessed. Typical of the same haughty, pushy, demanding, threatening, obnoxious and condescending tones universally-known to be as much a part of the Jewish state’s character as pasta and tomatoes are to Italian cuisine, the decree had the following to say–
‘To George W. Bush…who comes to Jerusalem, eternal capital of our land, joy of the entire earth…
…If you truly desire peace and wish to be counted in the company of the truly righteous, we call upon you to declare to all the world the following-
‘I George Bush declare that the Land of Israel was bequeathed to the nation of Israel by the Creator of the world. which He gave to His people Israel, the eternal people. Therefore I call upon all the nations to save themselves from certain doom and recognize that this land is the exclusive rightful inheritance of the people of Israel. He who denies this truth endangers all life on earth.’
The proclamation, reminiscent of the same threats of doom and destruction Moses issued when he put the heat on Pharaoh some years back continued with–
‘Or, Heaven forbid, you can choose the second option…to willfully aid in destruction…You certainly know what the God of Israel did to Egypt and to all Israel’s enemies from time immemorial. Do you imagine you can escape from the struggles in Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and Lebanon, by offering up the Jews who are slaughtered daily by their enemies? Remember our forefather Abraham, who pursued the world’s four greatest kings in order to redeem his nephew from captivity. We cannot forget the deeds of our patriarchs, whose example guides us through every generation…
…Understand this well–God ordained that the role of the nations of the world is to strengthen the nation of Israel. Therefore it behooves you to declare: “I, George Bush, Commander in Chief of the armies of the United States of America, will instruct all of my troops to protect the Divine rights of the nation of Israel, and remove from her any threat.” Before you is a choice: You can merit eternal life, or be inscribed for eternal disgrace. Your fate and that of all those with you hangs in the balance of the destiny of our land…’
To most reading this, these words no doubt appear as rambling, borderline-incoherent Old Testament nothings from some old rabbi who really likes reliving Israel’s Glory Days of ‘smiting’ this and that enemy. Not particularly gifted upstairs, it may even have appeared that way to George Bush, but the fact of the matter is that the old rabbi was deadly serious that day, as events in the last 2 weeks are now proving. In effect, what the rabbi was saying to the leader of the free world was ‘Give us the wars we demand or we’ll take the world down piece by piece, starting with America’. In the event some think he is some homeless nobody whose warnings are but empty words, what must be remembered is that he had to have received the go-ahead from both the secular and religious leaders of Israel in order to have gotten within spitting distance of ‘their’ boy George Bush, which means that his warnings were in effect an official diplomatic communiqué from the headquarters of Jewish interests worldwide, meaning Israel.
Most persons well-versed with Israel’s use of terror, intimidation and false flag attacks in achieving her desired ends have assumed (with good reason) she would eventually resort to her much-discussed ‘Sampson Option’, the military protocol calling for the use of nuclear weapons against the entire world in the event that the great experiment in Jewish self-rule turns out to be a failure. However, what many of these persons in-the-know failed to consider was that Israel has many weapons in her arsenal besides the aforementioned ‘conventional’ nukes, not the least of which is her power to destroy entire nations economically with the mere push of a button.
Such is what is taking place right now regarding the banking crisis that began in America and has now spread throughout the world like a wildfire. Like some Old Testament miracle where Yahweh, the God of Israel brings plague and pestilence upon nations who don’t ‘see things properly’ regarding His chosen people, entire swaths of financial territory have been (borrowing a much-used phrase these days) ‘wiped off the map’ as if they had never even existed, and this in a day and age where discrepancies on a balance sheet down to the penny can be detected and tracked down literally in a nanosecond.
One of the things to keep in mind throughout all of this is that if the present economic hurricane could somehow be blamed on ‘Islamo-fascists’, all the usual suspects would be doing there damnedest in trying to foment even more wars for Israel’s benefit. Despite the fact however that at present none have ventured forth with such a risky investment scheme as trying to pin the blame for the present woes on Osama Bin Laden, what must be kept in mind is that it is still early in the trading day and this may very well be what the powers-that-be are planning before the final market bell sounds.
As it is though, at present ‘they’–meaning the Zionist cabal responsible for wreaking havoc on the world markets–are busy trying to douse those ever-recurring flames dealing with the topic of Jews and all the ‘old canards’ surrounding their control of money and economics. The ADL–domestic branch of Israel’s Mossad tasked with spying on any and all persons considered inimical to the well-being of the Jewish state–recently beat a trail to the nearest microphone in order to decry the recent spate of ‘anti-Semitic’ (what else) conspiracy theories involving the present economic meltdown and how the Jews figure into all of it. With all the typical shrieking, wailing and gnashing of teeth that characterizes the collective Jewish voice in snarling-away any curiosity or awareness on the part of the Gentile world regarding Jewish criminality, the ADL’s ‘capo di tutti capi’ Abe Foxman had the following to say–
“As we witnessed after 9/11, whenever there is trouble or uncertainty in the economy or world events, Jews become the scapegoats, and ugly anti-Semitic canards are given new life.”
Of course, in the typical lying, obfuscatory fashion that is Foxman’s trademark, what he failed to mention is the fact that all those ‘anti-Semitic canards’ regarding Israeli (Jewish) involvement in 9/11 are canards as much as the La Cosa Nostra is an ‘old canard’ rooted in rabid ‘anti-Italianism’. After considering just a smidgeon of the numerous news reports citing official (meaning law enforcement) material surrounding the event, only a delusional fool or a liar would refuse to piece together the mountain of evidence indicating Israeli foreknowledge/involvement in the terror attacks that took place that day. Items such as the Israeli spy ring operating in America prior to 9/11, the text messages sent by Odigo instant messaging system warning Israelis not to go to work at the Twin Towers, the explosives-laden van driven by Mossad operative Sivan Kurzberg (who, after being arrested told police–‘We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem’ ) to the now-infamous ‘High-Fivers’–Israeli operatives witnessed filming the Twin Towers coming down and cheering are not mere canards, they are facts of history, documented by mainstream news sources both in America and Israel. In fact, so troublesome were these pieces of evidence that Foxman is said to have paid personal visits to various media executives in the days and weeks following 9/11 and told them to ‘can’ it’–meaning the news stories proving Israeli (Jewish) involvement in 9/11 saying ‘You’re killing us with this stuff’.
Therefore, what else can sane persons expect other than the ADL and other Jewish agents of disinformation come forth in the midst of an economic crisis unprecedented in history and preemptively ward-off any discussion of the fact that the financial/economic systems of America presently in meltdown mode are top-heavy with Jews, as testified by none other than the Jewish Telegraph Agency itself in a recent piece that spoke of the ‘conspicuously Jewish names adorning many of the nation’s top investment banks’ as well as the ‘wealthy that have made money on Wall Street and real estate and finance, as so many Jews have — some legitimately, some not so’.
The idea Wall Street and the main thoroughfares dealing with finance in America is dominated by Jews is not a theory. It is a fact that Jews themselves proudly acknowledge in Op-Ed pieces where–linguistically speaking–various pundits shrug their shoulders and say in effect, ‘Yeah, we run Hollywood and Wall Street? Big Deal’. Given political realities these days it only makes sense they would, as finance is a lever used in forcing Washington DC to act in the interests of the Jewish state rather than in the interests of America when making foreign policy.
Those who accept this fact–that American finance and Jewish interests go hand in hand like fortune cookies and Chinese take out–but who doubt that the two are interrelated as pertains the present economic downturn should think twice. The fact of the matter is that–despite the incalculable sacrifices in terms of money and blood made on behalf of the Jewish state by America with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan–organized Jewry is quite upset with Uncle Sam these days for refusing to go to war with Iran as Israel has demanded. The Jewish state needs this war like a heroin addict needs his fix ON TIME and not a second later and as of this moment dear little Israel is going through some pretty frightening symptoms of withdrawal. Her people, eager to get the Purim festivities going ASAP are like a rowdy, drunken mob at a rock concert when the band is late and are tearing the place up in protest. Keep in mind as well that ‘never forget’ is her motto, and that ‘turning the other cheek’ was not an idea that ever took root in the collective character of the Israelite people.
Therefore, the fact that America’s banks are dropping like flies with seemingly no warning ahead of time means the chance of it all being an accident is as likely as Elvis Presley popping up and announcing to the world that he did not die but rather was kidnapped by space aliens and taken away for the last 3+ decades. Whether it is in the interest of getting even with America for not ceding to Israel’s demand for war against Iran and Russia or whether it is to put the heat on the world to get the music started is irrelevant at this point. It is an act of war, or at the very least an act of coercion in putting the screws to those principally-Christian nations of the West drafted as foot soldiers in the wars to expand the Israeli empire against the Islamic world, a war known in some circles as ‘The New World Order’.
The truth though is that none should be particularly surprised that these nice Jewish folks would do such a thing. As the rest of the world is reminded on a regular basis, they are (spiritually speaking) the descendents of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others who are legends and role models in the Jewish community and whose exploits are held high as the standard which all tribe members are expected to imitate. One need look no further than the present economic misery being deliberately wrought against the Palestinians and the accompanying glee with which this misery is celebrated by Israel and her supporters throughout the world for proof that there is a sadism that permeates throughout the whole process of robbing people. There is not a recorded instance of IDF soldiers occupying a Palestinian home where money, jewelry and other items of value were not robbed from the owners.
More important than recent history though is the past, something which the non-Jewish world forgets to its own detriment. Recount that in the Old Testament it was the Israelite Joseph who became Pharaoh’s right hand man as a result of interpreting his dreams, after which time he was making a killing on grain speculation when Egypt and the surrounding areas were going through a famine. The final stage in the drama features the Egyptian people being completely despoiled of their property by Joseph in exchange for some food and some seeds. Later, as infamously recounted in the story of Moses and the exodus of God’s chosen people from that same country, the Israelites are told by Moses to ‘borrow’ the gold and silver of their Egyptian neighbors before fleeing. Upon arriving in the Holy Land, they continue their thievery, both in terms of the existing real estate and other items of wealth of the indigenous people whom they destroyed.
In effect then, what is taking place with regards to the exodus of American wealth is a repeat performance of what happened when the Israelites of old pretended to borrow the gold and silver of their Egyptian neighbors. In the same way as Americans ‘lend’ their money to Jewish banks and Jewish investment firms with the expectation it will be there when they ‘ask’ for it back, Jewish interests are now fleeing with the gold and silver as they high-tail it the hell out of America and into some new ‘promised land’ flowing with milk and honey, most likely one of the developing countries like China or India where there are plenty of desperate, hungry people who will work for pennies.
The timing of this meltdown lends further credence to the idea it is an Israeli operation aimed at bringing America and the West to their knees, as it is all taking place during the Jewish holy days beginning with Rosh Hashana and ending with Yom Kippur. Collectively the ten days are referred to as ‘the days of awe’, something that should elicit an audible ‘hmmmm’ by all concerned persons when considering the ‘shock and awe’ campaign of mass murder waged against Iraq by George Bush and his entourage of Jewish spies. Coincidentally (or not) the feast opening the days of awe, Rosh Hashana marks the opening of the economic new year and is called the ‘day of judgment,’ where Yahweh, the god of the Israelites, opens three ‘books of account’ and wherein the fate of the wicked, the righteous, and those of the middle class are recorded. The names of the righteous are immediately inscribed in the book of life and they are sealed “to live.” The middle class are allowed a respite of ten days, until Yom Kippur, to repent and become righteous and the wicked are “blotted out of the book of the living.”
In effect, the message being sent to Washington DC and the rest of the world was that they have a few days or weeks to get their collective act together and begin military operations against Judea’s ancient enemies in Persia lest they are ‘blotted out’ economically speaking.
Those who doubt that such historical and religious events play a role in operations of this type should consider the fact that Judea’s infamous ‘declaration of war’ against Germany in 1933 took place during Purim, the festival of revenge, as well as the war that has presently destroyed Iraq. The Jewish state is peopled by individuals who live in the 21st century BC while the rest of the world is living in the 21st century AD and it is the past that dictates all their actions.
The truly sad and sickening thing is that the handwriting is on the wall with regards to how this will be spun for ‘Christian’ consumption. As America continues to spiral downward economically, taking the world with her in Israel’s financial version of the Sampson Option, at some point the argument will be made (by Israel’s suggestion) through one or all of her many false prophets that this IS INDEED a repeat of Yahweh’s punishment for mistreating his favorite creatures has happened to Egypt. If only America had listened and done as she was told in attacking Iran, this would not be happening. The ‘fist of God’, just as hurricane Katrina was said to be a punishment on America for ‘forcing’ Israel to disengage from Gaza some years back.
It is at this time therefore that the words of war criminal Ariel Sharon should haunt the thoughts of people all over the world when he expressed longing for the day the world began to fear Israel rather than feeling sorry for her, adding ‘Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear our madness instead of admiring our nobility. Let them tremble, let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a savage country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go wild, that we might start World War Three just like that, or that we might one day go crazy’ as well as his infamous ‘We, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.”
And as the existing world order is torn to pieces by ‘mad dog’ Israel (as former Defense Minster Moshe Dayan referred to her) the words of Lord Rothschild, virtual founding father of the Jewish state–come into clearer view–
‘Give me control over a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws’. (more) -
Zionism is a Form of Racism and Racial Discrimination
U N I T E D N A T I O N S General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/RES/3379 (XXX) 10 November 1975 Thirtieth session Agenda item 68 RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY [on t... U N I T E D N A T I O N S
General Assembly Distr.
GENERAL
A/RES/3379 (XXX)
10 November 1975
Thirtieth session
Agenda item 68
RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
[on the report of the Third Committee (A/10320)]
3379 (XXX). Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination
The General Assembly,
Recalling its resolution 1904 (XVIII) of 20 November 1963, proclaiming the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and in particular its affirmation that "any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous" and its expression of alarm at "the manifestations of racial discrimination still in evidence in some areas in the world, some of which are imposed by certain Governments by means of legislative, administrative or other measures",
Recalling also that, in its resolution 3151 G (XXVIII) of 14 December 1973, the General Assembly condemned, inter alia, the unholy alliance between South African racism and zionism,
Taking note of the Declaration of Mexico on the Equality of Women and Their Contribution to Development and Peace, 1/ proclaimed by the World Con-ference of the International Women's Year, held at Mexico City from 19 June to 2 July 1975, which promulgated the principle that "international co-operation and peace require the achievement of national liberation and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms, as well as the recognition of the dignity of peoples and their right to self-determination",
Taking note also of resolution 77 (XII) adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its twelfth ordinary session,2/ hold at Kampala from 28 July to 1 August 1975, which considered "that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regimes in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure and being organically linked in their policy aimed at repression of the dignity and integrity of the human being",
Taking note also of the Political Declaration and Strategy to Strengthen International Peace and Security and to Intensify Solidarity and Mutual Assistance among Non-Aligned Countries,3/ adopted at the Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs of Non-Aligned Countries held at Lima from 25 to 30 August 1975, which most severely condemned zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all countries to oppose this racism and imperialist ideology,
Determines that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.
2400th plenary meeting
10 November 1975
_____________
1/ E/5725, part one, sect. I.
2/ See A/10297, annex II.
3/ A/10217 and Corr.1, annex, p. 3. (more) -
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3379
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, RECALLING its resolution 1904 (XVIII) of 20 November 1963, p... UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3379 (XXX)
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING its resolution 1904 (XVIII) of 20 November 1963, proclaiming the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and in particular its affirmation that "any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous" and its expression of alarm at "the manifestations of racial discrimination still in evidence in some areas in the world, some of which are imposed by certain Governments by means of legislative, administrative or other measures",
RECALLING ALSO that, in its resolution 3151 G (XXVIII) of 14 December 1953, the General Assembly condemned, inter alia, the unholy alliance between South African racism and Zionism,
TAKING NOTE of the Declaration of Mexico on the Equality of Women and Their Contribution to Development and Peace 1975, proclaimed by the World Conference of the Intenrational Women's Year, held at Mexico City from 19 June to 2 July 1975, which promulgated the principle that "international co-operation and peace require the achievement of national liberation and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, Zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms, as well as the recognition of the dignity of peoples and their right to self-determination",
TAKING NOTE ALSO of resolution 77 (XII) adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its twelfth ordinary session, held at Kampala from 28 July to 1 August 1975, which considered "that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regime in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a comon imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure and being organically linked in their policy aimed at repression of the dignity and integrity of the human being",
TAKING NOTE ALSO of the Political Declaration and Strategy to Strengthen International Peace and Security and to Intensify Solidarity and Mutual Assistance among Non-Aligned Countries, adopted at the Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs of Non-Aligned Countries held at Lima from 25 to 30 August 1975, which most severely condemned Zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperalist ideology,
DETERMINES that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.
2400th plenary meeting
10 November 1975 (more) -
An Amnesty for Stupidity, Patrick Buchanan
An Amnesty for Stupidity, Patrick Buchanan Is it fair that businessmen who fail in neighborhood stores have to close shop and often sell their homes, while Wall Street titans are spared the con... An Amnesty for Stupidity, Patrick Buchanan
Is it fair that businessmen who fail in neighborhood stores have to close shop and often sell their homes, while Wall Street titans are spared the consequences of monumental stupidity and greed?
No, it is not fair. Yet, Treasury's Hank Paulson may be right. To save the sheep who might have been wiped out in a general financial panic, we may have to save the pigs.
Life is unfair, said JFK.
Yet, this is going to be the mother of all bailouts. Paulson will be voted by Congress authority to spend $700 billion, 5 percent of our gross domestic product, to buy all that toxic paper stinking up the books of our biggest banks.
And this is not the first such bailout of foolish and incompetent financiers and politicians.
In 1975, when its cravenness to extortionate union demands had bankrupted New York, the Big Apple had to be rescued by Gerald Ford.
Marion Barry's Washington, D.C., was next in line at the cashier's window.
In the Reagan era, it was Chrysler. Later that decade, Citibank, Chase-Manhattan and Bank of America were staring into the abyss, as Latin American regimes, to whom they had lent scores of billions, were balking at paying their debts. Uncle Sam stepped in.
Then came the Mexican and Asian financial crises and the U.S.-IMF bailouts of the 1990s. The Mexican bailout was as much a rescue of Goldman-Sachs as Mexico City, as Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin's old firm was choking on all its Mexican paper.
The great myth is that these 1990s bailouts were models of U.S. financial statesmanship and great successes. The reality is the U.S. workers took it in the neck.
For the countries bailed out, like Mexico, Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea, were forced to devalue. This radically reduced the wages of their workers relative to American workers, creating incentives for U.S. manufacturers to shut plants here and move them abroad. The devaluations also slashed the price of foreign goods relative to U.S. goods. Imports flooded in.
Who ultimately paid for the Mexican bailout? Florida tomato growers wiped out by Mexican producers, the price of whose tomatoes was chopped two-thirds by the devaluation. U.S. autoworkers who saw Ford and Delphi plants shuttered as new Ford and Delphi plants opened in Mexico. U.S. textile workers whose mills closed and jobs vanished.
Middle-class American families have paid and paid -- in lost jobs, lower wages, a falling median income -- to save the big banks from the consequences of their follies. And those bank bailouts are behind the trade deficits that set five records in the Bush era, reached 6 percent of GDP, forced huge U.S. borrowings from abroad and ravaged the dollar.
Having bailed out Latin America, Mexico, Asia and their U.S. creditors, we now find our own country in trouble. And how are our allies reacting?
"Europeans on left and right ridicule U.S. money meltdown," ran the Los Angeles Times headline. Italy's finance minister compares us to corruption-ridden Albania, where "a nationwide pyramid scheme cost hundreds of thousands of people their savings and ignited anarchic civil conflict" in the 1990s.
How will the bailout work? Will every bank that brings in toxic paper be able to dump it on the Treasury? Will the Treasury buy securities based on subprime U.S. mortgages from foreign banks? Apparently so. What about mortgage-backed securities held by U.S. companies and individual investors? Is there to be a general amnesty for bad judgment, or just a bankers amnesty?
About one thing we may be sure. The U.S. deficit and national debt are going to soar. The credit rating of the United States, as this nation of non-savers has to borrow abroad to save its banks, and their banks, is going to fall. We are going to be a poorer nation and people.
As for the promises and plans of Barack Obama and John McCain -- be it for national health insurance or middle-class tax cuts -- they are going by the wayside. For the United States is as bankrupt as Lehman Brothers, with this difference: Uncle Sam can still borrow from abroad because foreigners see many juicy U.S. assets they would like to take off our hands with their hoards of ever-cheapening U.S. dollars.
Looking at the federal budget -- the five or six major items are Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense and interest on the debt. All are going up, as tax revenues fall. Add the cost of two wars and a bailout of U.S. banks that some estimate will cost $1 trillion to $2 trillion, and we appear to be looking at budget deficits ad infinitum.
"There is a great deal of ruin in a nation," Adam Smith once consoled a friend who lamented that Britain would be ruined if the 13 Colonies were lost.
We are about to test Smith's proposition. (more) -
A Dollar for Your Soul, by Earl Vickers
A Dollar for Your Soul, by Earl Vickers Originally published in Marion Zimmer Bradley's Fantasy Magazine #10, Autumn 1990. George's latest theory concerned human corruptibility. "Everyo... A Dollar for Your Soul, by Earl Vickers
Originally published in Marion Zimmer Bradley's Fantasy Magazine #10, Autumn 1990.
George's latest theory concerned human corruptibility.
"Everyone has a price," he claimed, "and the price is usually quite affordable."
I knew laughing would just encourage him. "Yeah, but not everyone," I argued.
"Everyone has some weak point." He paused, staring me in the eye. "It's just a matter of finding the weakness and exploiting it."
I felt a cold draft from the air conditioner. The librarian was giving us a nasty look. "So what are you saying?" I whispered.
"I'm saying, if someone hasn't already sold out on everything they ever believed in, it's just because they haven't been given the right opportunity. I bet in a week's time a person could get every single kid in eleventh grade to sell their soul."
This time I laughed. "Well, if anyone could, it would be you, George."
"You know, you're right! What a great idea!"
"What, you're going to go around buying peoples' souls?"
"Sure, why not? I'll corner the market — the entire junior class. By next Friday." George thought for a moment. "Yeah, I bet I could do it."
"No way."
"Fine. Let's have a little wager. If I win, it proves my theory is right, that everyone is corruptible. If you win, I'll freely admit I was wrong."
"That would be a first," I said.
"Indeed."
I'd never known George to lose a bet, but there was no way he could win this one. He might get two or three souls — he did have an exceptional eye for defects in another person's character. But every single kid in eleventh grade? In one week? I, for one, had no intention of selling my soul to anyone, for any price.
I agreed to the wager.
Over the weekend, George printed up a batch of very official- looking soul-transfer forms. I watched him in action on Monday morning.
"Think of it as free money. Sign your name, get a dollar. It's that simple."
Mark Sommerfield took one of the forms and read it.
"'The bearer of this note hereby assumes full ownership of the soul originally belonging to the undersigned.'" He paused. "I don't get it. What do you want with our souls?"
"It's just a hobby," said George. "Like collecting stamps, or coins, or beer cans."
"Yeah, but this is different," said Mark. "I mean, don't you think my soul's worth more than a beer can?"
"Depends," said George.
"You could at least make it ten bucks."
"You know, that's the beauty of our free-enterprise system. If you can get ten dollars — or a million — somewhere else, be my guest. But I think you'll find the current exchange rate is...well, let me double-check." George pulled out his calculator and did a few quick computations. "Yes, the soul is trading at one dollar even."
Mark tried for a dollar and a half but finally gave in.
"Okay, one dollar. But I still think it's worth more than that." He hesitated. "I don't have to sign in blood or anything, do I?"
"Not necessary," George replied, removing a four-color pen from his shirt pocket. "A mere formality from the past. Ink is perfectly acceptable, though of course...red is preferred."
George clicked the red button on his pen and handed it to Mark. Mark signed the transfer-of-ownership form and received his dollar.
George got half a dozen more souls before second period, but lots of other kids turned him down.
I saw him again at lunch. The word had spread, and now he had people crowded all around him. Some of them wanted to prove how fearless or free-thinking they were. Others took his offer as a joke, and they were happy to play along. They figured the contract couldn't be legally binding. And for many, the motivation was simply to get their free dollars before the money ran out.
Billy Schoenwetter walked over to George's lunch table. George always called him Billy Bedwetter. Billy was shy, awkward, and not real bright. He would do anything to be part of the group.
"Will you buy my soul?" he asked, in his usual quavery, crackly voice.
"You don't have a soul," said George, "and if you did I wouldn't buy it."
Billy got all upset. "I do too have a soul."
"Prove it."
Billy looked confused. The other kids were trying not to laugh out loud.
"Well?" demanded George.
"I do too have a soul," repeated Billy.
"I doubt it. And even if you did, I wouldn't take it if you paid me."
"Yes you would."
"Get lost."
Billy looked as if he were about to cry. He took a dollar bill out of his wallet, wadded it up and threw it at George.
"There. Where do I sign?"
"Look," said George, straightening out the dollar, "I have to be selective. I can't just buy every soul that comes along."
"How much?" asked Billy.
"Five bucks."
Billy looked in his wallet. "I only got three."
George sighed. "Fine. Give me what you have and bring the rest tomorrow."
Billy gratefully assured George that he would bring the money first thing in the morning. He proudly signed the transfer form and showed it to George.
"See, I really do have a soul," he said.
George took the form and corrected Billy's grammar. "Did — past tense." Billy looked confused again.
George's business was booming now. It had become the new fad. But lots of kids still thought it was disgusting and wouldn't sell for anything.
After school I met George on the front steps. He opened his briefcase and showed me all the souls.
"I gave Ray two dollars for his," said George. "I figured a black guy has more soul."
I shook my head. "Where'd you get all the money, anyway?"
"Oh, I told my dad I was running a small start-up company, so he lent me fifty bucks in venture capital. I've already spent most of it," he said. "I think that's about all of the easy souls."
"So how are you going to get the rest?"
"I don't know. But I'll think of something."
Tuesday morning before school, a large crowd of students gathered, waiting for George. These were the same kids who had dealt with him the day before. Some were angry; others seemed scared.
They were talking about what horrible dreams they'd had all night. They said they didn't know it was going to be like this. George entered the building and was immediately surrounded.
"We've changed our minds," said Beth Reinhart. "We want our souls back."
"A deal is a deal," insisted George. "You should've thought of this before. I'm sure in time you'll get used to it. Lots of people don't have souls."
They didn't think they'd get used to it. Ever. They tried to describe the horror, the desperation, the guilt, the sense of loss. They tried pleading, begging, threatening.
"Give me back my soul," said Paul Chamberlin, "or I'm going to the principal."
There was an uneasy silence.
"Well, do what you want," said George, "but you'll get in trouble too. After all, what kind of person would sell his immortal soul for a dollar? And what if your parents found out? What would they think?"
Paul backed off. "Okay, okay. I won't turn you in. At least not right now. But I still want my soul back."
George suggested they all just keep quiet and let him think about it. They reluctantly agreed.
George sat in the back for first period English. His leg was nervously bouncing up and down, shaking the floor, vibrating the whole room. Suddenly his face flashed a familiar grin. I could tell I was witnessing the birth of a great and revolting new idea.
After class George was again mobbed by kids without souls.
"Okay," he said. "I've reconsidered. You can have your souls back" — their eyes lit up — "for ten dollars...and three more souls." His offer was met with shock and disbelief, as the implications gradually sank in.
"And," he continued, "the three additional souls must be from our class, at least until eleventh grade is all sold out. You might want to start with your best friends. Toward the end you'll probably need to be somewhat creative."
The kids lined up, took the blank soul-transfer forms, and walked away, slowly, as if in a trance. Their eyes were empty, their faces pale. I could see it beginning already: an army of zombies roaming the halls, looking for new victims. One of them, a guy I didn't even know, bumped into me by accident and asked if he could borrow my soul, just for a few minutes.
"I'll take real good care of it," he said. "Here, you can use my school I.D. for collateral."
I pushed him aside and went to have a talk with George.
"Don't you see what's happening?" I asked.
"Yeah. It's fascinating."
"But look at them! They've turned into walking, talking corpses."
"It's just their imagination," he explained. "One person wants his soul back, and suddenly they all do. It's contagious, just like the way everyone wanted to sell their souls yesterday."
"Yeah, it's like a disease, and you're making them spread it."
"I'm not making them do anything," said George. "I'm just giving them the opportunity. Yesterday they had a chance to prove what whores they are, and now they get to prove what pimps they are."
"So what does that make you?"
"Listen," he said, holding up one of the soul-transfer forms. "This isn't really a person's soul. It's just a piece of paper. Just like a dollar bill — it's only worth something because people believe it is. I'm just trading one piece of paper for another, and the green paper's more valuable, that's all." He smiled. "I knew there had to be a way to make money at this. Buy low, sell high!"
"And you can just sit back and watch while they do your dirty work for you."
"I call it M.Z.M....Multi-Zombie-Marketing. Yeah, I've really outdone myself this time."
"Yeah, you sure have." I walked away.
By afternoon the place had become a madhouse. The demand for souls was growing steadily. Rich kids offered bounties and finder's fees for information leading to the purchase of a third soul. Other kids, seeing an opportunity, moved in as middlemen: agents, brokers, bankers, scalpers, wholesalers, retailers. They thought they could profit from the turmoil without getting caught up in it. Everywhere I went I saw poker games, purse-snatchings, lotteries, auctions — souls begged and borrowed, bought and sold. The teachers were starting to wonder if something was going on.
The next morning, people were scrambling to buy up the souls that were left. Some of the kids were mad at me for not selling them mine.
George sat next to me for third period. While we were waiting for class to start, he told me everything that had been happening.
"I was getting my books, and Doug, the football jock, he comes over and picks me up and slams me against the lockers. Said something about wanting his soul back. I explained to him that if he ever wants to see it again, he should refrain from hurting me. In fact, he should see to it that no one else tries to hurt me either. So now I've got a bodyguard!"
"That's nice," I replied.
"And Amy's been selling her soul to everyone she can find. She's making all kinds of money, and then these kids come to me and think they're going to get their souls back, and I have to explain that I already have an Amy and theirs is a duplicate."
I didn't say anything.
"And then Roger brought in three souls and I didn't know who one of them was, so I asked him. Turned out it was his grandmother. He said she's always happy to do whatever she can to help him out with his school work. He was so upset when I told him it didn't count."
"This is all going to backfire on you, George," I said quietly. "It's not too late to call it off."
"No way."
"We can pretend like you won the bet, and you can keep all the money."
"No," said George. "Honor is at stake."
"Well, I don't think you're going to get too many more. A lot of kids have just given up. Plus they don't want to put their friends in the same situation they're in."
"Oh yeah?" George grinned. "I'll fix that."
Mr. Huffman came in and started writing on the blackboard. As usual, his trousers were covered in chalk dust. George wadded up a soul-transfer form and chewed on it for a minute. Then when it was nice and sticky he threw it so it landed on the board right next to where Huffman was writing. Huffman paused, then turned around. All eyes were on George.
"Is this yours, Mr. Foltz?" Huffman pointed at the spitball while staring George in the eye.
"No sir," said George. "I believe it belongs to Billy."
"Mr. Schoenwetter, is that true?"
"I...I hope not," said Billy. The other kids laughed, nervously.
"You don't know whether you threw a spitball or not?" asked Huffman, incredulously.
"Uh, no sir. I mean, yes sir, I do, but I d-d-didn't..."
"Mr. Huffman," said George, "I believe if you unwad that slip of paper you'll find Billy's name on it."
The students laughed again.
"I have no intention of touching that disgusting thing. Mr. Schoenwetter, perhaps you would be so kind as to remove your personal property from the blackboard so we can carry on with our discussion?"
"Yes sir." Billy half-ran toward the front and retrieved the spitball. "Thank you, sir."
Huffman gave George a raised-left-eyebrow stare, then turned and went back to his writing.
Later in the day, George was occasionally seen off in a corner playing with a cigarette lighter, burning little scraps of paper. Now the kids were more desperate than ever to get their souls back, before it was too late.
At the end of fifth period, Lisa Adams saw me on the second floor and came over and started talking to me. She was my girlfriend, sort of. She looked pale, like the other kids.
"You know that thing about people buying each others' souls the last couple of days? Well, I fell for it. I can't believe I was so stupid."
"Wow." I shook my head. "This has really gone too far. I wish there was something I could do to help."
"Well, actually, there is. See, George says he'll return it if I can just get him ten dollars and three more souls."
I took a step back.
"Oh, relax," she said. "I'm not going to ask you for money. You're too good a friend for that."
I drew back another step.
"I've already got the ten dollars, and two of the souls. I was just thinking, it would be really nice if you could..."
I turned and started walking away.
"...if you could let me have your soul."
"No!"
I walked faster. She was following me. I turned the corner and headed for the bathroom.
"I wouldn't ask you if I didn't love you!" she said.
I rushed into the boy's room. I found an empty stall and sat down. That was close.
But then the bathroom door swung open. "I know you're in there," she said.
Urinals were flushing and zippers were zipping. There was a chorus of protests.
"Where are you?" she sang.
She walked over and started peeking into the stalls one by one. Her voice was getting closer. "George says it's not so bad once you get used to it."
I got out of the stall and headed toward the window. She was right behind me.
"Please! You've got to help me!"
I took one look back at her. Then I jumped out onto the first story roof and ran like hell.
I got to the end of the building and climbed down to the ground. I decided to cut my last class.
Thursday morning, everyone wanted my soul. I was the only one left. I couldn't walk down the hall without being surrounded by zombies.
I sat in the back row for third period math class. George took the empty seat next to me. He said he'd give me half of the money he'd made if I'd sell him my soul. I didn't answer.
He looked around the room at the other students. "Well, if you don't sell me your soul, one of these goons will find a way to get you to sell."
Mr. Huffman came in. He drew a big triangle on the board and started talking about chain letters and pyramid schemes.
"These schemes are based on what is called the 'greater fool' theory," he said. "They require an ever-growing number of greater fools to pay off the previous investors. Amazingly enough, at some point you always run out of fools."
"George," I whispered, "he knows something about the souls."
"Be quiet."
"In economics we find something called deficit financing. Can anyone explain how that works?" Huffman droned on and on.
"I bet he knows about the whole thing," I whispered.
"Think so?" said George. He didn't look disturbed at all. He was listening intently, probably soaking up ideas for his next scam.
"Where else do we see this basic pyramidal structure? How about the food chain? How about nuclear fission, the population explosion, the spread of disease. Again, the same geometrical progression, the same multiplier effect...."
"George, what if he turns you in to the principal? You'll get suspended."
"Shut up. This might be important."
"No, I don't think so. He wouldn't test us on this stuff."
"How about the spread of ideas?" said Huffman. "Publishing. Broadcasting. Even teaching, on those rare occasions when anyone bothers to pay attention."
"George, he'll make you give back all the souls."
George smiled. "I don't think so," he said. He pulled a slip of paper out of his briefcase and showed it to me.
"The bearer of this note hereby assumes full ownership of the soul originally belonging to the undersigned. Sincerely, John K. Huffman."
I looked up. Huffman was staring at me. His face was chalky, ghostly pale.
I saw George again after school. He increased his offer, throwing in everything he could think of.
George knew me better than anyone. He knew my greeds and hungers, my fears, my dreams, my nightmares. He tried all of them. Finally he ran out of ideas.
"Look," he said, "I don't know what else to offer. See if you can think of something. What do you want right now, more than anything?"
I just wanted him to give everyone's souls back. I started to say something but he interrupted me.
"I know," he said excitedly. "How about if you give me your soul in exchange for all the others? Then, if you want to, you can give them all back to the original owners."
I didn't know what to say.
"Just think," said George, "you'll be the most popular kid in the class. People will look at you and say to themselves, 'He saved my soul. He sacrificed his soul for mine. What a guy!'"
"But what about my soul?"
"I'll treat it as if it were my very own."
"Will I ever get it back?"
George tilted his head. "Hard to say.... So, is it a deal or not?"
I thought for a while. George looked at his watch a couple times. "Okay, okay," I said. "It's a deal."
I signed the form.
"So I guess I win the bet," said George, smiling.
"Looks that way."
I put the souls in a paper bag and left for home. I went to bed early that night. I didn't sleep very well.
In the morning, I thought about charging everyone a dollar apiece to get their souls back. It was only fair that I should get something out of it. But it seemed too creepy, so I didn't.
I started giving them back for free, between classes. But no one seemed particularly grateful. Most of the kids had reached a state of total apathy. If anything, they looked at me with cold distrust, as if the whole thing were my fault. I was sorry I'd ever tried to help them.
George talked to me after History.
"How many do you have left?"
I looked in the paper bag. "A dozen or so."
"I've been thinking. I feel really bad about you not having a soul of your own. Tell you what — I'll give it back in exchange for any one of the souls you have left. I'll even let you choose which one."
What was George up to now? If he was trying to tempt me, it was working. I closed my eyes and thought for a minute.
"Look," said George. "You sacrificed part of yourself for these kids, and what did you get? Nothing."
I opened the bag and leafed through the pieces of paper, looking at the names, saying them to myself. Finally I handed over one of the forms.
"Ah, 'Lisa Adams,'" he read. "Excellent choice."
Suddenly I realized what I was doing.
"You won't tell her, will you?"
"No, of course not," he said, handing me my transfer form. "Here's your soul back — it's only slightly damaged. I do hope you'll take better care of it in the future."
I folded the piece of paper and put it in my wallet. I felt better immediately, but not a lot better.
Later in the morning I finished giving back the rest of the souls. At lunch, Lisa came over to my table and started yelling at me. She was furious.
"George says you picked me to be the only person in the whole class who doesn't get their soul back."
I didn't know what to say. I felt terrible. I didn't think George would tell.
Lisa was crying. "How could you do this to me? I thought you were my friend. Why did you have to pick me?"
I got up and walked out. I wasn't very hungry anyway.
In the afternoon I cornered George and took him into an empty classroom.
"You betrayed me," I told him.
"You betrayed Lisa," he said. "I just thought someone should let her know."
"You said you wouldn't tell her!"
"I didn't tell her. I wrote her a note."
"You make me sick." I shook my head in disgust. "Aren't you getting bored with your little game yet?"
"Actually, yes I am," he replied. "You want to hear my latest plan?"
"No! I just want you to give Lisa's soul back."
"Forget it."
"But George, you've proven your point. You already got every single person in eleventh grade..." I stopped for a moment. "Wait a minute, maybe not."
"What do you mean?" he asked.
I looked at George. "I just realized — you haven't won your bet after all!"
"Sure I have."
"No. Remember, the bet said everyone in eleventh grade had to sell."
"They have. I checked all the names. You were the last one."
"No." I pointed at George. "You're the last one! You haven't sold your soul. Tell you what — I'll give you a dollar for it."
"That wasn't part of the deal and you know it!"
"I don't recall you making any kind of exception for yourself."
"Well, no," said George. "It was just understood."
"You said everyone could be bought. So how about you? Would you sell your soul to win this bet?"
George glared at me. "Do I look stupid?"
"Well, then, what would you sell it for? What's your price?"
"If you have to ask, you can't afford it," he said, acting unconcerned.
Lisa walked in. Apparently she'd overheard the whole thing.
"I think the reason you won't sell your soul is because you never had one," she said, with barely controlled rage. "Or else you wouldn't be so cruel. Maybe you've succeeded in proving that the rest of us are corruptible, but that's only because we're human, because we had souls to begin with. Unlike you."
"Hey, I have a soul. I have one right here," he laughed, waving a piece of paper.
Lisa grabbed for it. "That's not your soul, that's mine!"
"Not anymore it's not," said George, pulling the paper out of her reach. "It belongs to me, fair and square."
I got between them to keep Lisa from beating him to a bloody pulp. "Look, George, I've got an idea. You're saying that you're the owner of this soul, which used to be Lisa's, right?"
"Right."
"So, in a sense, this is 'your' soul, right?"
"That's right. My personal property."
"And you're the only one left who hasn't sold. So if you sell this soul, which is, quote, 'yours', that'll mean everyone in eleventh grade has sold their soul. Right?"
"I guess so. Sort of."
"So if you sell it back to Lisa, you'll win your bet, and Lisa will have her soul back."
George laughed. "Do you think your logic is sufficiently twisted?"
I shrugged. "Maybe. So is it a deal?"
"Well, I've grown rather fond of this one," he said, looking at the transfer form. "But if that's what I have to do to win the bet..."
Lisa cautiously handed George a dollar with one hand and took her soul back with the other. She stared at him resentfully.
"So, George," I said, "it looks like all you've done is proven you're just as corruptible as the rest of us. You finally went and sold your soul."
"Well, it wasn't really 'my' soul," said George. "It was Lisa's."
"Oh, so now it was my soul," said Lisa. "So you didn't really sell your soul. Well that's too bad. I guess you lose your stupid little bet after all!"
George started mumbling something about technicalities. Lisa and I looked at each other and broke out laughing.
"Come on George, admit it. You lost and you know it."
George hesitated, then grinned. "Okay, fine. You're right. I lost. I was wrong. Not everyone is corruptible."
He raised an eyebrow. "Just everyone except me!"
The End (more) -
Sarah Palin–Israel’s ‘Bitch’, by Mark Glenn
Sarah Palin–Israel’s ‘Bitch’, by Mark Glenn ‘Bitch’–It’s an ugly word, for sure, and not one I am accustomed to using as cavalierly as some might imagine here. I always winced when I heard it gr... Sarah Palin–Israel’s ‘Bitch’, by Mark Glenn
‘Bitch’–It’s an ugly word, for sure, and not one I am accustomed to using as cavalierly as some might imagine here. I always winced when I heard it growing up as a kid, mostly because I always held women in such high respect and because I was sure that in 9 out of 10 cases where the word was used it was most likely unjustified. After all, they–women–are the bringers of life and who civilize us (hopefully) through their influence in the home. Can you imagine what a mess the world would be in if it was the guys raising the children instead of the gals? The kids would speak in mono-syllabic grunts rather than full sentences and would settle all issues with their fists instead of their mouths and brains.
So my use of the word ‘bitch’ comes with a LOT of hesitation, believe me. Mz. Palin is the mother of 5 children, and for that she deserves mucho respecto as far as I’m concerned. She–like a good number of women in the ‘Christian’ west these days–could have kneeled at the communion rail of Roe V Wade on many occasions, including when she learned her most recent child would be born with Down’s Syndrome. Instead, she elected to have the chalice pass from her lips, much to the rage of feminists who pay to have their children killed for matters of simple convenience in what has become something of a sacramental rite in America these days, God help us. Despite what I consider to be her seriously-misguided religious ideas concerning Israel and the Jews, I’m sure had she been around in a better time period in this nation’s history–meaning a time when the Jewish state and her spies DID NOT dominate our political system–she would have been a great stateswoman.
Let me clarify further–I use that ‘b’ word in describing her not because she stomps around barking out orders at those around her, complaining about this and that and generally making life hell for everyone in her vicinity. In this case, the word ‘bitch’ encompasses that other use of the word we hear so much these days, meaning ‘whore’, or someone willing to lower herself (or himself) into doing immoral, degrading, and life-threatening things for a fistful of dollars, or, as in the case of our elected representatives, a fistful of political power. As she demonstrated to the world in the last few weeks since her nomination as Republican VP, she–like a streetwalker negotiating with a prospective client over what services she’s willing to perform and for what price–has let it be known she is willing to go ‘all the way’ with Israel’s demands, regardless of how raunchy or immoral these demands are. Not only towing the line with regards to the fatal myth that the Jews are ‘God’s chosen’ and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, namely stealing the real estate between the two ‘great rivers’ of the Nile and the Euphrates as well as the right to murder anyone they see fit at anytime they so decide, she has also embraced the other fatal myths of our modern times as well–that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and that Iran must be stopped at all costs from ‘wiping Israel off the map’. She calls herself ‘pro-life’ but in perfect Zionist double-speak has signaled she will use her office to rain down death on millions, possible even billions of innocent people and all of it for the ‘Jewish cause’. She calls herself a Christian and yet has promised Israel that the Jewish state will continue receiving her daily diet of 15 million dollars from good ole Uncle Sam so she can continue de-Christianizing the land made sacred by the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and in general making life for the Palestinians there a living hell.
And if these weren’t bad enough, Mz. Palin has now gone on record saying that war with Russia is a real likelihood, and not ‘war’ as in the ‘cold’ one but rather the real deal, just as the Neocons have wanted since Trotsky and his gang were ousted from power in the early 20th century.
And so, at least in the political sense, Palin IS a whore, or, using the less-polite language of gangstaz and gangsta-wannabes, ‘a bitch’. By her own admission, she will do anything, no matter how dirty, degrading or immoral it is so that Israel and her supporters ‘get off’ the only way they can, which is through bloodshed, the suffering of innocent people and corruption of otherwise healthy political systems. And in the event some don’t like my choice of racy words here, remember this–I am only following the example set forth by the man destined to replace the aging, swelling John Hagee as Supreme Pontiff of the Christian Zionist movement, none other than pastor Rod Parsley himself, John McCains’s ‘spiritual mentor’ who used the very same racy verbiage when he, speaking about America’s proclivity towards killing Muslims exclaimed like a seasoned snake-handler speaking in tongues ‘We’re bred for battle!…We get off on war!!!
Putting this in better perspective, consider the fact that Palin ‘the patriot’ (as she is now being fashioned by the Jewish mass media in America) is throwing her support behind a Marxist-founded state that has–
1. Blown up American buildings in Egypt in what was known as the Lavon Affair…
2. Attacked a United States ship, the USS Liberty, resulting in the deaths of 34 American sailors with the intention of sinking her so Egypt could be blamed and WWIII started between the US and the USSR…
3. Played an active part in the bombing of the US marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, resulting in the deaths of almost 250 servicemen…
4. Plotted to assassinate George HW Bush at the Madrid peace conference in 1991 in order to–surprise, surprise–’blame the Arabs’…
5. Stole America’s most sensitive national security secrets from her spy Jonathon Pollard and then sold them to America’s enemies at that time, the USSR. If indeed America finds herself at war with Russia as Israel would like to see take place, no doubt these secrets will be used to better kill America’s young men and women, assuming of course that it remains a war solely outside the confines of the US, which is highly doubtful…
6. Played an indispensable role in the attacks of 9/11, so much so that hundreds–let me repeat for emphasis–HUNDREDS of Israeli spies were arrested, some in circumstances as incriminating as filming the Twin Towers coming down and cheering and who later admitted on Israeli TV that they were ‘sent to document the event’…
…and this is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. One day, after this mess is all over and assuming the US has not been reduced to ashes following a nuclear war, there will be an entire wing of the Library of Congress devoted to the problems this nation has endured as a result of Israel and her influence over our affairs.
And this folks is the ugly truth concerning Palin. As I said, were these better times, I would be getting all hot and bothered about her candidacy too, but the fact is that she is there for one reason and one reason only, which is to get an otherwise unelectable John McCain elected president so that the Jews can have the other wars they have scheduled, meaning Iran, Syria and Russia. You can bet your last dollar that were she not ‘right with God’, meaning were she the least bit contrary to Israel and the demands of the Jewish state, be it the war in the Middle East or whatever, she would remain in that obscure, out of the way place and no one would know Jack Squat about her.
The other thing of course to consider, but unmentioned up to this point, is the fact that I am not the only one saying this about her, that she is ‘Israel’s Bitch’, and this is where it gets REALLY ugly. The fact is, this is what the Jewish state and her supporters think of her, their public comments notwithstanding. Yes, guys such as Brooks and Lieberman and all the others may at present be swooning and fawning all over her as if she were Esther reborn, but to them she is just a piece of gentile meat created by God to serve the Jews, what they refer to in their own parlance as a ‘Shiksa’.
Yes, that’s right, all you conservative, bible-believing Christians out there who think that the Jews have finally ‘come around’ and seen the light with regards to the things near and dear to our conservative hearts pertaining to protecting the unborn, the Constitution and ‘family values’ as we define them, the fact is this–She is just another Britney, Madonna, or any other Barbie doll-creation of the Jewish mass media. She–like they–has been shoved out on the stage where–politically-speaking–she bats her eyes, moans and groans, suggestively rubs her hands over her body, wiggles and jiggles and bumps and grinds in front of us and all in the interest of keeping us excited, excitable, and distracted from what the hell is really going on in the world.
And make no mistake about it. All the praise they are heaping on her right now will be short-lived. Keep in mind how the Jews welcomed Jesus into Jerusalem as a king, shouting ‘Hosanna to God in the Highest’ and laying palm leaves in His path and then a week later these same creatures were calling for him to be crucified and the murderer Barabbas released.
No, once Palin has been used for their purposes, meaning once they have gotten from her what they want (meaning getting warmonger John McCain elected to the presidency) the ‘honeymoon’ will be over and she will be told to ‘get the f*** out of here bitch’ just as they would to any ordinary whore whose services were no longer required.
And the real truth is, Mz. Palin has a lot more to worry about than simply being ‘removed’ from the political scene by any scandals that may develop around her. Washington DC–a veritable outpost (in both the literal and figurative sense) of Meyer Lansky’s Murder Inc–has become a gangland where individuals live and die based upon whether they are worth more dead than alive to the powers-that-be. It may very well turn out that what is REALLY planned here is the classic one-two knockout punch, meaning Palin gets McCain elected, and then, batta-bing/batta bang/BATTA-BOOM–she is assassinated by some ‘Islamic terrorist’ and McCain makes Lieberman his VP (which was the original plan anyway) and then when Little Johnnie has some ‘accident’ befall him, Lieberman becomes prez, America falls into Israel’s hands like a ripened fruit and thus all impediments removed from the Jewish state getting what she really wants. Remember–we are talking about people here who believe they are the embodiment of God and who have–not just the capability of doing the worst, but rather the proclivity. After all, lest we forget, it is the Talmud itself, the engine that drives these people and their agenda that states “Tob shebe goyyim harog’, meaning “Even the best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.’
And so, my fellow Americans, fellow humans, lovers of peace and justice, if you think my opinion and the language used in expressing this opinion too harsh concerning that ‘good Christian woman’ Mz. Palin who is most likely destined to be our next vice president (at least until her motorcade is blown up by Al Qaeda) what I say in my defense is thus–I am tired of the non-stop political pornography we see these days…, sick of seeing bitch after bitch after bitch paraded out before us who degrade themselves and degrade what is supposed to be their sacred duties to our nation by whoring themselves out for the benefit of the Madame of the house, Israel. I am sick to the point of vomiting over the manner our elected officials–who swore an oath to be faithful to America, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in heath, for better or for worse till death do us part as they take turns getting down on their knees and or on all fours and then perform whatever disgusting services are demanded of them by the Jewish state, an insatiable nymphomaniac for political power that never seems to get her fill. I am sick of America suffering from all the ills-political, social, cultural or whatnot, resulting from the legion of venereal diseases we have contracted through our illicit, immoral intercourse with the Jewish state. We have become a sterile, barren woman whose womb is so polluted through immoral behavior that it can no longer produce any life for our nation, meaning peace, prosperity and political stability. I long for the by-gone days of fidelity and continence of American political life, where America was first, second and third in the hearts and minds of our leaders instead of them putting the interests of a terrorist state ahead of our own. I lament the day that men like George Washington, John Adams and others–men who would never have consented to sell their country for 30 pieces of silver to ANY interest nor allow the governing infrastructure of America to be infested with spies and saboteurs as it exists today–were replaced with the likes of George Bush, John McCain and the rest.
It is something we are going to have to decide folks–we are either going to have America as a beacon of light where Lady Liberty runs the show or a brothel dominated by whores for Israel, and as one wise man once said, ‘You cannot serve two masters, for you will either love the one and hate the other or hate the one or love the other.’
For myself, this latest creation in the person of Mz. Palin leaves much to be desired, no matter how low she is willing to go in debasing herself in what has become the Zionist Burlesque Revue. Give me someone not as easy on the eyes but whose love for America does not take 2nd place to the interests of a foreign power and who understands that when she takes that oath of office, what she is really saying to America is ‘for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in heath, for better or for worse till death do us part.’ (more) -
Bush is a fundamentalist/evangelical
Bush is a fundamentalist/evangelical. Under Bush, the fundy-damn-mentalists have gone from viewing Hades pornography in their heads to actually being in bodies in Hades and doing the re-enacting. A... Bush is a fundamentalist/evangelical. Under Bush, the fundy-damn-mentalists have gone from viewing Hades pornography in their heads to actually being in bodies in Hades and doing the re-enacting. All that is required, according to Dr. Jeramiah, is to get “evicted” as an evangelical. It’s “live” undead, instead of memorex, and even a dateless nerd like Falwell can get laid. Sad, sad, Saducess and wild, wild, west. Two Men and a Truck. Jump into the Seine. The evicted are then trapped in Hades, having left behind their home on Earth. Term limits illiteracy. Bush is like Jim Jones orchestrating this mass homo(sexual)cide IED-HIV-HPV terrorist “states-of-affairs”/ affairs of the state depart-MEAN-T Colin “large in-test-in penis hole superimposed on your large intestine” Powell-Condo-lease-a “lesbo” leezza Lisa Rice Coolio-Kool-Aids. It’s Bob Jones University, the zionist/racist terrorist-tear-o-our-is-t neurological-pyschopathological “state” of Israel, the z hole (v hole, d hole, n hole, a hole) mouth and (Tony Beison-Torri Wells) ton-gue of Fritz Haber-Zyklon-B-Paula Abdul. All that exists are Julia-Lewis (Luis Gaghole) Dreyfus states-of- affairs, that supervene each other in memory – ex: The high-tech Hades Matrix. The “transexual” “movie” is directed by “rah-rah” Gampy, the Abraham incestuous sodmite “Father”, who thinks of itself as a fundamentalist/evangelical “Spartacus” “sadomasochist” “ar-MEAN-ian” who, although serious, isn’t really mean enough, never could get past the wimp factor, even with the voice of the solomonite Kirk Douglas and the s/hell game one in ¾’s “girls”; and still the neutered nerdy Pre-eclampsia stillborn hope is that there can be some limited freedom obtained through Lola Laura “the librarians” “razor blade” “four men” “suck my friends dick” mouth. But with eviction, as with the end of a presidential term, at least when the gleichshaltung has run out of steam, there is no longer any “address” or memory, except RAM BAM reamings Rambus DRAM ROM; and all the chaos, flux, and indeterminacy of guilt, loneliness, and isolation of had Had-es… (more)
-
We The People Must End the Reign of ZOG
It is obvious that the pregnancy of Bristol was planned, so what does it mean? The daughter's "5 month" pregnancy is an attempt to tie in the 17 year olds fertility, imagined as virility, to Sarah... It is obvious that the pregnancy of Bristol was planned, so what does it mean? The daughter's "5 month" pregnancy is an attempt to tie in the 17 year olds fertility, imagined as virility, to Sarah Palin's "vice" presidency, which already includes Sarah's "veto" of a bill that would have denied benefits to gay state employees and their partners. Here is a brief summary of the veto (1):
"Log Cabin Republicans are optimistic but admittedly in the dark about Palin's positions on gay and lesbian issues. They cite Palin's veto as governor of a bill that would have denied benefits to gay state employees and their partners. However, her reasons for vetoing the legislation are complicated (2).
The Associated Press has reported that she didn't sign the bill on the advice of the Alaska attorney general, who adviser her it would be unconstitutional. The bill was a direct response to a 2005 Alaska Supreme Court decision requiring the state to offer benefits to same-sex partners.
A statement released with Palin's veto suggests she opposed the benefits: 'The Governor's veto does not signal any change or modification to her disagreement with the action and order by the Alaska Supreme Court.'"
What do the two have to do with each other, the pregnancy of Bristol, obviously planned to be at "five" months when announced, and the "veto" on the bill which would have denied benefits "to gays and their partners".
It's simple: If you know the jews are cursed by God for doing sodomy, and that the jews want to lure anyone they can into Hades, but also close the "arbeit macht frei" gates of Hades upon the Earth, then you can see the "carrot" the jews are offering to the schmucks of Hades: Sexual health and activity as exhibited in a young healthy looking Alaskan female named Bristol who is five months pregnant at age seventeen just as her mother Sarah accepts the Vice Presidential offer of John McCain.
Talk about some Co-Caine! Man, this is like uncut late 70’s Columbian or, for you jews, pure crack co-caine; and injectible, if you like: A chance to go to Westworld, "Just Like Heaven" (3), and engage in sexual contacts with Her Majesty's Government, a.k.a. Bristol; or, if your a Mormon moron, the Old Testament loophole, a.k.a. Sarah, who will espouse family values, but abominably vote duh, yet according to the law, ya' all. Was accepting the in Vitro Down Syndrome child, Trig, according to the law, Sarah? Or is that too "complicated"?
“Hey, wait a minute?” would be the response of any even short con schmuck, looking for the angle, say Bogart: “Sees, I dunno why yous promising sexuals health and all, and that little baby got that sickness is all”. Sounds like mengele “heaven”, even to a schmuck heathen. So, why Obama “Jim Jones” LSD/LDS “euphoria” at the Republican Convention?
It’s simple: If you’re a networked shit-for-brains zombie, it doesn’t matter whether your republican or democrat. You are or you will be rendered a mindless automaton of the “two” party totalitarian bolshevic/menshevic system, and all its crack whores on Oracle machinations.
And this just in: Photos of the seventeen-years-old-and-five-months-pregnant Bristol have surfaced. In one she is holding a gigantic bottle of Captain Morgan’s Spiced Rum with “her friend” (4). And in another, just below it, you can see Bristol and another girl each holding a “shooter”, while looking up at the Gampy cam, which appears to be in the smoke detector!
Do these girls represent the Bush twins (5)? For those who still don’t know, George W. is the catamite malakoi bitch of Gampy, who done raised him wanting him to go straight, even getting that boy he’s very own Country Star (6). And when George W. didn’t “take” the twins? Well, Gampy just helped heself. And what did the jews give Gampy, for a’ helpin’ ta confuse homosexuality with sodomy all under the rubric of sodomy? Gampy spends he’s time in Hades hotel rooms, with the helmet cam, and ¾ “girls”. George W. did finally get the twins bedded, even showing Jena how ta be a man and take herself, which was actually daddy in her body and the body of others, both men and women.
So, are these photos some kind of code indicating continuity to those in the Bush-McCain camp? Yes. You see, with Barack Obama annihilated by Patrick M. Griffin, Ari Fleisher (7), “the butcher” who gave Sarah Palin that “beautiful Down Syndrome baby”, that “going down” into Hades “sin drome”, wants the entire county to vanish into a sink hole of Jaws and Jurassic Park horrors under the direction of the Republican Party, which the retarded crack whore on Oracle Fleisher conflates with Humanity, for having rejected Obama (8).
What Fleisher is doing is saying to the Human Race, “damned if you do, damned if you don’t”, or, perhaps more accurately, considering the past and recent “stereotypical” white trash publicity stunts, “Better the Devil you know than the Devil you don't”.
We The People must reject Obama and McCain, and end the reign of ZOG.
Notes:
(1). See: http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2008/09/04/3382/gay_republica...
(2). See: http://mediamatters.org/items/200808290025
(3). See: http://www.justlikeheaven-themovie.com/
Note that the actress Reece Witherspoon has a genetically altered body that is made to look slightly Down Syndrome and the head slightly with hydrocephalus. See Witherspoon at the end of this Obama ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZdi1JnMxFU&feature;=user
(4). See: http://www.techbanyan.com/1258/bristol-palin-drinking/
(5). See: http://www.thefirsttwins.com/both2004.html
(6). See: http://www.georgestrait.com/
Note the current George Straight is amalgam of George Straight with Phil Hartman.
Jeb was with Mama, but it’s unclear if Bare were sadistic.
(7). Ari Fleisher is still serving as Press Secretary, and I believe is behind the pregnancy of Bristol, which was no doubt in Vitro, and the taking and release of the photos showing her and others with alcohol.
(8). Is Ari Fleisher Barack Obama? No doubt the only other extra-terrestrial alien I know of, Condoleezza Rice, is Michelle Obama. I at first doubted that Ari Fleisher was Barack Obama, but now I think it just might be the case, especially as I have recently viewed nerdy footage of Barack Obama, and the “Jim Jones” stoned faces of h/is “supporters”. Remember that Ari Fleisher still controls the Bush Presidency, which is essentially just the ZOG Condoleezza Rice Department of State terrorist state of Israel. See: http://www.sodahead.com/blog/13886/
Everyone should be on high alert. (more) -
It's that Obama is a Sodomite, Retards.
Barack Obama is a sodomite. Sodomites don't like the New Testament. The New Testament is the teachings for Christians, and all Christians must be committed to destroying the sodomites. Only with th... Barack Obama is a sodomite. Sodomites don't like the New Testament. The New Testament is the teachings for Christians, and all Christians must be committed to destroying the sodomites. Only with the destruction of the sodomites, the diasporic space of sodomy known as judaism, can the Earth be saved, and the Kingdom of God established here on Earth, with the merging of Heaven with the Earth. This is the return of the Natural/Supernatural Order, the very order that the sodomites have damaged and driven from the Earth. People must recognize their Christianity is essential to sound environmental policy and stewardship of the Earth.
The jews wrote the Old Testament for one reason: God had destroyed sodom and gomorrah, and the jews wanted to make a "loophole" for sodomy (1), so that they could continue to do sodomy. The jew tactic was to bury and confuse the prohibition on sodomy with a large number of other regulations, many of which were jibberish and nonsense (2). Here is the passage from Obama’s “Call to Renewal Keynote Address” (3) that was in the video:
“And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.”
Leviticus is trouble for sodomites, because in no uncertain terms it, the very law of the Old Testament, clearly prohibits sodomy (4), and with the penalty of death (5). So, what does Obama do? Same as the jews did with Leviticus and the rest of the Old Testament: They added other laws, and many of them, to confuse and obfuscate that it was just the doing of sodomy that got the jews cursed. Obama mentions two from Leviticus that are absurd: The allowing of slavery and the rule that eating shellfish is abomination. Obama then cites another absurd consideration from Deuteronomy (6), "which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith".
Then Obama follows up the slick but very shortened use of this long ago exposed approach with a drunken haymaker, an attack on the Sermon on the Mount! (7). The Sermon on the Mount is perhaps the most important of the teachings of Jesus Christ about the new age and the eschatological Kingdom He has come to proclaim. It is like a mini catechism and summary of Christian beliefs and principles. To assail this cornerstone of Western and World civilization after a very lame attempt to confuse the Old and New Testaments as "the Bible" is very strange indeed, especially because in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus Christ tells his followers to be even more generous than the Mosaic law requires: “Be ye perfect,” he says, “even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect”.
Is the Sermon on the Mount, as Obama states, “a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application”? Certainly Obama knows the things that I am stating in this essay, although Obama and h/is cronies would not have thought it possible just a little over two years ago, that We The People of The United States of America and The World would have the ability to educate ourselves and each other about the conspiracy of judaism against We The People. Yet even then Obama, or at the very least the jewish speechwriters, were particularly concerned about American military might; and especially the possibility that such awesome power might soon be in the hands of We The People of the United States of America and in the defense of liberty for all Humanity (8).
Notes:
(1). Hence the ludicrous account in Genesis 18: 16-33, no doubt written by the Pharisees, where Abraham haggles not so much for the saving of sodom and gomorrah as for the secure future of jewish diasporic sodomy worldwide:
Genesis 18:16-33 (New International Version)
Abraham Pleads for Sodom
16 When the men got up to leave, they looked down toward Sodom, and Abraham walked along with them to see them on their way. 17 Then the LORD said, "Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do? 18 Abraham will surely become a great and powerful nation, and all nations on earth will be blessed through him. 19 For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, so that the LORD will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him."
20 Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous 21 that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."
22 The men turned away and went toward Sodom, but Abraham remained standing before the LORD. [a] 23 Then Abraham approached him and said: "Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked? 24 What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will you really sweep it away and not spare [b] the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people in it? 25 Far be it from you to do such a thing—to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike. Far be it from you! Will not the Judge [c] of all the earth do right?"
26 The LORD said, "If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake."
27 Then Abraham spoke up again: "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, though I am nothing but dust and ashes, 28 what if the number of the righteous is five less than fifty? Will you destroy the whole city because of five people?"
"If I find forty-five there," he said, "I will not destroy it."
29 Once again he spoke to him, "What if only forty are found there?"
He said, "For the sake of forty, I will not do it."
30 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak. What if only thirty can be found there?"
He answered, "I will not do it if I find thirty there."
31 Abraham said, "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, what if only twenty can be found there?"
He said, "For the sake of twenty, I will not destroy it."
32 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak just once more. What if only ten can be found there?"
He answered, "For the sake of ten, I will not destroy it."
33 When the LORD had finished speaking with Abraham, he left, and Abraham returned home.
Footnotes:
a. Genesis 18:22 Masoretic Text; an ancient Hebrew scribal tradition but the LORD remained standing before Abraham
b. Genesis 18:24 Or forgive ; also in verse 26
c. Genesis 18:25 Or Ruler
(2). Other instances when jews have used this tactic include the 888-page Warren Commission Report Report, to which the Commission published 26 volumes of supporting documents, including the testimony or depositions of 552 witnesses and more than 3,100 exhibits. Don’t find that strange? Among the 3,100 exhibits were a study of Ruby’s mother’s dentures and Oswald’s pubic hairs.
Obama’s disregard for “folks” sounds very similar to the contempt for the American People that Allen Dulles, a Warren Commission member, had:
"But nobody reads. Don't believe people read in this country. There will be a few professors that will read the record...The public will read very little."
(September 6, 1964, Warren Commission internal memo)
The fact is that whether or not People know of the jibberish minutia of Mosaic and Talmudic law, they know that sodomy is wrong. There is a huge difference between a ban on eating shellfish – no doubt made because many had gotten sick from eating shellfish because of the lack of refrigeration – and the ban on sodomy. Sodomy violates the sacred sexual essence with which God created Human Beings. Humans Beings have an intuitive knowledge of this from their Nature, and are not going to be talked out of it by anyone, no matter how slick or seemingly distinguished they sound or act.
(3). Here is the entire address:
Call to Renewal Keynote Address
June 28, 2006
Washington, DC
Good morning. I appreciate the opportunity to speak here at the Call to Renewal's Building a Covenant for a New America conference. I've had the opportunity to take a look at your Covenant for a New America. It is filled with outstanding policies and prescriptions for much of what ails this country. So I'd like to congratulate you all on the thoughtful presentations you've given so far about poverty and justice in America, and for putting fire under the feet of the political leadership here in Washington.
But today I'd like to talk about the connection between religion and politics and perhaps offer some thoughts about how we can sort through some of the often bitter arguments that we've been seeing over the last several years.
I do so because, as you all know, we can affirm the importance of poverty in the Bible; and we can raise up and pass out this Covenant for a New America. We can talk to the press, and we can discuss the religious call to address poverty and environmental stewardship all we want, but it won't have an impact unless we tackle head-on the mutual suspicion that sometimes exists between religious America and secular America.
I want to give you an example that I think illustrates this fact. As some of you know, during the 2004 U.S. Senate General Election I ran against a gentleman named Alan Keyes. Mr. Keyes is well-versed in the Jerry Falwell-Pat Robertson style of rhetoric that often labels progressives as both immoral and godless.
Indeed, Mr. Keyes announced towards the end of the campaign that, "Jesus Christ would not vote for Barack Obama. Christ would not vote for Barack Obama because Barack Obama has behaved in a way that it is inconceivable for Christ to have behaved."
Jesus Christ would not vote for Barack Obama.
Now, I was urged by some of my liberal supporters not to take this statement seriously, to essentially ignore it. To them, Mr. Keyes was an extremist, and his arguments not worth entertaining. And since at the time, I was up 40 points in the polls, it probably wasn't a bad piece of strategic advice.
But what they didn't understand, however, was that I had to take Mr. Keyes seriously, for he claimed to speak for my religion, and my God. He claimed knowledge of certain truths.
Mr. Obama says he's a Christian, he was saying, and yet he supports a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.
Mr. Obama says he's a Christian, but supports the destruction of innocent and sacred life.
And so what would my supporters have me say? How should I respond? Should I say that a literalist reading of the Bible was folly? Should I say that Mr. Keyes, who is a Roman Catholic, should ignore the teachings of the Pope?
Unwilling to go there, I answered with what has come to be the typically liberal response in such debates - namely, I said that we live in a pluralistic society, that I can't impose my own religious views on another, that I was running to be the U.S. Senator of Illinois and not the Minister of Illinois.
But Mr. Keyes's implicit accusation that I was not a true Christian nagged at me, and I was also aware that my answer did not adequately address the role my faith has in guiding my own values and my own beliefs.
Now, my dilemma was by no means unique. In a way, it reflected the broader debate we've been having in this country for the last thirty years over the role of religion in politics.
(4). Leviticus 20:13 (New American Standard Bible)
13'(A)If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.
Cross references:
Leviticus 20:13 : Lev 18:22
(4). Although the Talmud, the secret loopholes to the Mosaic law for the elders, the Pharisees, allows homosexuality if it is done while studying the Talmud! There are also loopholes for pederasty, which might explain why NAMbLA is such a sacred cow of judaism. See: http://www.rense.com/general73/judm.htm and http://come-and-hear.com/editor/america_6.html
(5). See this article for an excellent discussion of the teachings against homosexuality in the New Testament and an outstanding expose of a homosexual "scholar" of the Bible, Boswell: http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/greek/boswell.html
(6). I believe this is the passage where the “suggestion” Obama refers to is given:
Deuteronomy 13:6-11 (New International Version)
6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, "Let us go and worship other gods" (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. 9 You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone him to death, because he tried to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 11 Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again.
(7). The Sermon on the Mount is recorded in Matthew 5-7 and Luke 6:20-49.
In the Gospel of Matthew, the first sermon of Jesus is the Sermon on the Mount.
The Sermon on the Mount begins with the Beatitudes. It also contains the Lord's Prayer; the Golden Rule (“Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them”); the commandments to turn the other cheek, go the extra mile, and cast not pearls before swine; the image of false prophets as wolves in sheep's clothing; and many other well-known teachings, including: “Ye are the salt of the Earth,” “ Love your enemies,” “Consider the lilies of the field,” “Judge not, that ye be not judged,” “ Ask, and it shall be given you,” and “ By their fruits ye shall know them.”
Matthew 5-7 (New International Version)
Matthew 5
The Beatitudes
1Now when he saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His disciples came to him, 2and he began to teach them saying:
3"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11"Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Salt and Light
13"You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled by men.
14"You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. 15Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.
The Fulfillment of the Law
17"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
Murder
21"You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder,[a] and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.' 22But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother[b]will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca,[c]' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.
23"Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift.
25"Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still with him on the way, or he may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. 26I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.[d]
Adultery
27"You have heard that it was said, 'Do not commit adultery.'[e] 28But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
Divorce
31"It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.'[f] 32But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
Oaths
33"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.' 34But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God's throne; 35or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.
An Eye for an Eye
38"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.'[g] 39But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
Love for Enemies
43"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor[h] and hate your enemy.' 44But I tell you: Love your enemies[i] and pray for those who persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
Matthew 6
Giving to the Needy
1"Be careful not to do your 'acts of righteousness' before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.
2"So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 3But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Prayer
5"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 6But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. 7And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. 8Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
9"This, then, is how you should pray:
" 'Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,
10your kingdom come,
your will be done
on earth as it is in heaven.
11Give us today our daily bread.
12Forgive us our debts,
as we also have forgiven our debtors.
13And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from the evil one.[j]' 14For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.
Fasting
16"When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 17But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, 18so that it will not be obvious to men that you are fasting, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Treasures in Heaven
19"Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. 20But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. 21For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
22"The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of light. 23But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!
24"No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.
Do Not Worry
25"Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more important than food, and the body more important than clothes? 26Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? 27Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life[k]?
28"And why do you worry about clothes? See how the lilies of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. 29Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. 30If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31So do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' 32For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. 33But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. 34Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.
Matthew 7
Judging Others
1"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
3"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
6"Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces.
Ask, Seek, Knock
7"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.
9"Which of you, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! 12So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
The Narrow and Wide Gates
13"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
A Tree and Its Fruit
15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'
The Wise and Foolish Builders
24"Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. 25The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. 26But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash."
28When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.
Footnotes:
a. Matthew 5:21 Exodus 20:13
b. Matthew 5:22 Some manuscripts brother without cause
c. Matthew 5:22 An Aramaic term of contempt
d. Matthew 5:26 Greek kodrantes
e. Matthew 5:27 Exodus 20:14
f. Matthew 5:31 Deut. 24:1
g. Matthew 5:38 Exodus 21:24; Lev. 24:20; Deut. 19:21
h. Matthew 5:43 Lev. 19:18
i. Matthew 5:44 Some late manuscripts enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you
j. Matthew 6:13 Or from evil; some late manuscripts one, / for yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.
k. Matthew 6:27 Or single cubit to his height
Luke 6:20-49 (New International Version)
20Looking at his disciples, he said:
"Blessed are you who are poor,
for yours is the kingdom of God.
21Blessed are you who hunger now,
for you will be satisfied.
Blessed are you who weep now,
for you will laugh.
22Blessed are you when men hate you,
when they exclude you and insult you
and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.
23"Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their fathers treated the prophets.
24"But woe to you who are rich,
for you have already received your comfort.
25Woe to you who are well fed now,
for you will go hungry.
Woe to you who laugh now,
for you will mourn and weep.
26Woe to you when all men speak well of you,
for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.
Love for Enemies
27"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.
32"If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' love those who love them. 33And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' do that. 34And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' lend to 'sinners,' expecting to be repaid in full. 35But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. 36Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
Judging Others
37"Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
39He also told them this parable: "Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit? 40A student is not above his teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like his teacher.
41"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 42How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,' when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
A Tree and Its Fruit
43"No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. 44Each tree is recognized by its own fruit. People do not pick figs from thornbushes, or grapes from briers. 45The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks.
The Wise and Foolish Builders
46"Why do you call me, 'Lord, Lord,' and do not do what I say? 47I will show you what he is like who comes to me and hears my words and puts them into practice. 48He is like a man building a house, who dug down deep and laid the foundation on rock. When a flood came, the torrent struck that house but could not shake it, because it was well built. 49But the one who hears my words and does not put them into practice is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. The moment the torrent struck that house, it collapsed and its destruction was complete."
(8). Benjamin Franklin long ago recognized this spiritual and intellectual talent of the citizens of the United States: “We are more thoroughly an enlightened people, with respect to our political interests, than perhaps any other under heaven. Every man among us reads, and is so easy in his circumstances as to have leisure for conversations of improvement and for acquiring information.”
Obviously not all Americans have time to read and dismantle all the discourses of judaism, especially because the discourses are so nonsensical. However, those Americans who do, especially because their enlightenment is that of a Christian, make a special and determined effort to get the information they uncover to We The People. (more) -
The Terrorist States-Of-Affairs and Affairs of State......
The Terrorist States-Of-Affairs and Affairs of State of the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair ZOG Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama Department of State Terrorist State of Israel, by Patrick M. ... The Terrorist States-Of-Affairs and Affairs of State of the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair ZOG Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama Department of State Terrorist State of Israel, by Patrick M. Griffin
The anti-christ is judaism. Judaism is led by the ram bam, Moses Maimonides, a.k.a. Moshe Ben Maimon. However, I calculated the numerical value of the letters and I didn't get 666.
The ram bam has been having many puppets reign as "false messiahs” or “saviors” of various groups, having them be caricatures of the second coming.
First, it was the ram bam itself, as Adolf "Schicklgruber" Hitler: The ram bam had "Schicklgruber" descend from the clouds, imitating a descending from Heaven, in the infamous propaganda film "Triumph of the Will" (1). At the same time there was the moron Stalin, the leader of the communist "saving" of Russia with the USSR. Also, the beyond pathetic Mussolini in Italy, who, as the absurd return of a Roman Emperor and Empire, couldn't have been any more of a caricature. Here in the USA, we had the chain-smoking FDR and the New Deal, to “save us” from the Great Depression. In Britain, it was the drunkard Winston Churchill "saving" the Brits in WWII, a war Churchill helped start.
Later in the USA, it was JFK. The first Catholic President? No, but a ram bam inversion of that, with Kennedy being the first malakoi kouros boy in office. Also Ronald Reagan, the Hollywood actor who played the legendary George Gipp, “leading” America into astronomical deficits as he dissolved into Alzheimer shades. Then Clinton, the first openly malakois kouros boy office holder; and the third, after JFK and Nixon, although Clinton is the only one who is also a munchkin. And of course there is the malakoi transsexual George W., who is the "second coming" of Joseph Smith, Jr., the founder of Mormonism, and the "savior" of terrorism (2).
And then the ram bam concocted Barack Obama who, as the porn star Jake Steed (3) -- who was supposedly born Jason Anyiam Okezie, a mixed-race Brazilian-American, and who first appeared in 1990 and disappeared in 2001, after having been arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and rumored to have AIDS -- made many porno films with none other than Condoleezza Rice, who had the "transsexual" identity Inari Vachs, supposedly a Serbian-American (4) from Michigan (5) , and appeared on the porn scene in November 1997 at the age of 23 (6).
Condoleezza Rice, as Inari Vachs (7), Inari being the Shinto kami of rice (8), “stole” the Phallus from Barack Obama in a porno scene in 2000 (9).
What does this mean? First, a little bit of information on Inari, and then on the Phallus.
Inari is one of the most mysterious deities of Japan. “He” is both male and female. Each year he/she descends from a mountain to the rice fields. The fox is Inari's messenger and it is believed that he/she can assume a fox's shape. Inari is sometimes conceived of as a collective of three or five individual kami. The deity may also assume the shape of a spider in order to teach wicked men a lesson. Inari is portrayed with a beard and carrying two bundles of rice.
As the symbolic version of the phallus, a phallic symbol is meant to represent male generative powers, especially male sexual power that is very healthy and potent. According to Sigmund Freud's theory of psychoanalysis, males, because they possess a penis, can possess the symbolic phallus as well; and are presumably powerful and potent in the other things they do, as fathers, leaders, etc., although Freud does not discuss this.
Freud claimed that women develop in childhood “penis envy”, and want to have a penis, while men suffer from “castration anxiety”, the fear of being castrated. In the symbolic understanding, women want the power men have, and men fear losing their status as men. Because the woman does not have a penis, she can never have the phallus. Later “Post-Freudian” psychoanalytic theory would posit that the symbolic phallus could be lost by a man, not by the man losing his penis in castration or with impotence, but because of power relations, especially as they exist in discourse and language and the media.
Condoleezza Rice, who I once nicknamed “the conned whore lesbo lice”, has penis envy all right, but not like you would think, that s/he wants the symbolic phallus in and as a powerful AIPACian political career and influence extending all the way to the White House and to the Presidency and beyond.
So how does Condoleezza Rice want to have the phallus then? S/he doesn’t want to be a man and actually have a penis, does s/he?
In the book “Gender Trouble”, published in 1990, and no doubt written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, the author, Judith Butler, a Professor in the Departments of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley, starts to chip away at the Freudian conception of the symbolic phallus by pointing out that the connection between the phallus and the penis is not such that the penis is identical with the phallus: "The law requires conformity to its own notion of 'nature' (10). It gains its legitimacy through the binary and asymmetrical naturalization of bodies in which the phallus, though clearly not identical to the penis, deploys the penis as its naturalized instrument and sign" (11). In other words, according to the lesbian jew Butler, heterosexuality is only a cultural construction, and the penis is thought of as the phallus because of the heterosexual construction of sexuality.
The construction is, according to the tenured Berkeley professor Butler, a performative construction, where repetition of heterosexual sex acts results in the construction of what is then thought to be the natural, essential, “core” heterosexual genders of male and female. Therefore, according to the lesbian sodomite Butler, the heterosexual genders of male and female are not prior to the performances by which they are constructed, and only exist with the repetition of the performances of the heterosexual sex acts. For Butler, there is no natural, biological heterosexuality without the heterosexual sexual performances, the heterosexual sexual activity, which causes, s/he claims, People to mistakenly believe that heterosexuality is the natural and biological sexual identity prior to the performances that construct the heterosexual sexual identity.
But why does Butler do this? What is it that s/he and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, like Condoleezza Rice, really want?
In “Bodies that Matter”, published in 1993, and of course also written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, Butler further deconstructs psychoanalysis, and the goal of the "Professor" and h/er cronies is unveiled. If, according to Butler, “Freud enumerates a set of analogies and substitutions that rhetorically affirm the fundamental transferability of the phallus from the penis elsewhere, then any number of other things might come to stand in for the phallus” (12).
So what is it that the lesbian malakoi Butler and h/er cronies want to transfer the phallus from the penis to?
The transsexual Rice and h/er cronies seek to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris, to construct what Butler terms a “lesbian phallus” (13). It is a long way from bra burning feminists like Gloria Steinem, although s/he, Steinem, is certainly part of the same group as Butler and Rice & Co.
If the transference is to be done, there would have to be, according to Butler’s theory, performances that would transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. What performances would do this?
You would think that it would be performances like “the female superior position” (14), or “the woman has a whip and disciplines the man”, or some disgusting “69 position”, or some other nerdy understanding and performance. But it’s much more nerdy, and sociopathologically so, then even the nerdiest gynecological 70’s porno.
Let’s take a look at a scene, a performance, from a porno movie, and no doubt one of many performances by Condoleezza Rice – Inari Vachs was in over 300 porno movies -- in which Rice “steals”, in perhaps one of many ways, the phallus from Barack Obama.
In the scene, Inari Vachs, Vachs meaning “f---s”, and also “fox” (15), is lying on h/er side, looking back at Jake Steed with her head held up by one of h/er hands, and the other hand free. Steed has h/is penis inserted into Vach’s anus, and is performing a sort of anal missionary position sex on Vachs (16). Sounds like Steed the man, giving it to the hot babe Vachs, Steed the stud. So how did Rice, as Inari, the fox, steal the phallus from Steed?
Although Steed has a large and erect penis and a seemingly healthy muscular body –- Steed meaning “stud”, but also “seed”, as in sexual potency -- and is thrusting hard into the anus of Vachs (17), Vachs is not ecstatic and is lying still, giving instructions to the silent and struggling Steed, while staring intensely at the would be stud, and with very dirty, loud, and sexy language.
Steed the stud loses it, and pulls out to ejaculate the premature orgasm that is a part of h/is losing the phallus, because h/e lost control because Inari was so domineering in h/er control of the situation. Vachs grabs the penis, never blinking, and holds it firm while continuing to stare at Steed, even as semen is ejaculated onto h/er entire face; and even after Steed is done s/he continues to hold and fellate the penis and secure h/er possession of the phallus (18).
No doubt there were more “performances” to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. Vachs went on to do many lesbian scenes, running away with the “lesbian phallus” s/he had stole from Steed, and retired in the summer of 2002.
The performances in which the phallus is stolen are not just those on film, but also others that involve physically damaging the penis so that the penis can no longer get erect. This transference is done by then calling the “erect” clitoris the phallus. This mengele performance is done to those men from whom the phallus cannot be stolen with discourse or language or the media (19).
This “fox” or f--- hole x, or transference, is of course what Inari Vachs set out to do in 1997; and is why s/he chose the name Inari, the name of the Shinto kami that can appear as both sexes, and that has the fox as a messenger, and who can appear as a fox.
I have seen the phallus defined as the sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris once the gender is selected as the fetus develops (20). This is obviously an incorrect definition because once gender is selected, the body of the baby develops and the child will definitely have either a penis or a clitoris, but certainly not both. Everyone knows a boy is a boy and has a penis, and grows up to be a man with a penis; and a girl is a girl and has a clitoris, and grows up to be a woman with a clitoris.
So who, or what, is Barack Obama, and what does porno have to do with the political careers of Rice and Obama?
Barack and Michelle Obama are recombinant DNA abominations. They are sodomites from Hades who are the puppets of the jews and extra-terrestrial aliens like Condoleezza Rice, who are using the jews as a vehicle to colonize and destroy the Earth (21).
Does Condoleezza Rice control Barack Obama, or is s/he actually in the body of Barack Obama, or is s/he in the body of Michelle Obama, but really the one in charge, like Hillary was thought to be the brains of the Clinton Whitehouse?
I don’t know, but at the very least Barack and Michelle Obama are networked shit-for-brains whores to the jews. Is Condoleezza Rice? Yes, of course; and s/he even fancies h/erself an inverted sex goddess, a "naturalized", through the many “performances”, sadistic lesbian who has the phallus, h/er clitoris, and the backing of AIPAC (22)(23)(24).
I'm not sure what to make of the number 666 (25), but all of these "leaders" are certainly satanic, and the ram bam is their leader (26).
Notes:
(1). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.helmut-schmidt-onl...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
(2). If George W. Bush is the “second coming” of Joseph Smith, Jr. what might h/e do to restore the early Christian church as demonstrated in the New Testament, and to prepare the earth for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ? If you accept that Mormonism was created by jews and that it is a sect within judaism, then you know that George W. is an agent of the jews, and “the second coming” must be prepared by establishing the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the ZOG Condoleezza Rice Department of State. This is the inversion of The Kingdom of God. When this is done, then the anti-christ may assume power.
So who is the anti-christ? As stated earlier it is the jews, who are led by the ram bam. Is Condoleezza Rice and Barack Obama in power sufficient for the jews being the “leaders” of the “Lost World” of Jaws and Jurassic Park horrors? I believe the jews think so, and it may be that George W. is Barack Obama (a), and Michelle Obama is Condoleezza Rice, and they are possibly each other; and the election of this abomination, it was hoped, would herald the triumph of the gates of Hades upon the Earth.
Notes:
(a). If Obama is not George W., I can’t think who it would be. I don’t think it’s just Jake Steed, and I don’t think it’s Joe Biden. And I don’t think it’s the ram bam, or Ari Fleisher, either.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(3). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Wha...
Jake Steed may be based on or derivative of the porn star Peter North, who may be the transsexual identity of Anthony Perkins of “Psycho” fame.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(4). This possibly has to do with the ethnic cleansing and genocide done by the whore Condoleezza Rice's pimp, the terrorist state of Israel and the jews, especially as Bosnia was a discourse way of justifying the terrorism being done by jews against The Palestinian People. Steed, supposedly a Brazilian-American, is the "Native Person" Rice is ethnically cleansing, if you will, with h/er emasculation of h/im.
(5). Why did Vachs appear from Michigan? I returned from NYC to Michigan in November 1997. I never gave Condoleezza Rice or any other sodomite permission to do anything via me, and Rice is not my nemesis. No one may violate the child of anyone for any reason, of course, even if a parent or the parents agree to the child being violated. Obviously all Human Beings have Human Rights protection, even if one or both of their parents are from Hades.
(6). Inari Vachs may be derivative of two porno starlets who preceded h/er: Isis Nile and Nicole Lace. Isis Nile was based on the Egyptian goddess Isis.
See:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm06...
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm04...
www.aomovies.com/explore/Nicole Lace/stars.html
www.torssexdvd.com/pages/debi...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Clock...
http://www.godado.it/engine.p...
(7). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://movie-tv-episode-datab...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(8). See:
http://www.onmarkproductions....
http://www.pantheon.org/artic...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.answers.com/inari
(9). See:
http://www.game-port.com/back...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0...
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt02...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm088...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm082...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(10). This is no doubt a claim that Nature must be rendered according to judaic law, the “law” of the Talmud. See: http://www.webshas.org/ishus/...
(11). Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York, Routledge, 1990), pg. 135.
(12) Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York: Routledge, pg. 62.
(13). "The Lesbian Phallus and the Morphological Imaginary," pp.57-91, Chapter 2 in Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex" (1993).
(14). Not that there is anything wrong with the woman on top, there isn’t. But I suspect the jews think this position emasculates the man. However, I think that both men and women enjoy this position, and do this position at least some of the time, and in no way is the man's or the woman’s sexuality negated or changed. The thoughts of jew “experts”, such as Dr. Ruth Westheimer, on this position only further evidences the jews being nerdy and neutered; and shows that in no way should they be involved in the sex lives or in the sexual health of People. See: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/s...
(15). Ivana Humpalot, a character from the movie “Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me”, played by Kristen Johnston, is no doubt based on Inari Vachs, although her name also is a parody of Xenia Onatopp from the James Bond film “GoldenEye” and her character is a parody of Russian Female Agents Anya Amasova/XXX (James Bond film " The Spy Who Loved Me"), Tatiana Romanova (James Bond film " From Russia With Love") and Pola Ivanova (“A View To A Kill”). Ivana meets Austin during a photo shoot, following which they play an erotic game of chess. The scene is a spoof of the 1968 movie “The Thomas Crown Affair”. Ivana Trump may also have to do with Ivana Humpalot. Xenai Onatopp, played by Famke Janssen, emascualted men by crushing them to death with her legs while she was in the female superior position!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(16). This could be an abominable representation of Jesus Christ and John at the Last Supper:
In the Gospel of John, there are four verses (John 13:23; 19:26; 21:7; 21:20) which refer to the "disciple whom Jesus loved", generally interpreted to be John himself.
Several scholars have used these verses to argue that Jesus and John had a homosexual relationship, recently most notably by Jennings (2003). Jennings argues that these verses and the intimacy displayed between Jesus and John, especially at the Last Supper where John is described (John 13:23) as "reclining next to him" (TNIV) or "leaning on Jesus' bosom" (KJV), implies that they were in a homosexual relationship.
However, this interpretation is rejected by most Biblical scholars, who believe that the disciple "whom Jesus loved" refers to a deep friendship and non-sexual intimacy between Christ and his favorite apostle. For example, Vasey (pp.121-124) uses the "deepest intimacy" of the friendship of Jesus and John to affirm homosexual relationships (sick!), but rejects the idea that Jesus and John themselves were in a homosexual relationship.[2] It is also dismissed by Gagnon (2001) in his large-scale study The Bible and Homosexual Practice, not least as the word translated "loved" is the Greek word agape (used, for example, in John 3:16; "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, eros.
Responding directly to Jennings' claims, Gagnon argued that Jennings misunderstood ancient culture, as people would recline while eating, so the man "leaning on Jesus' bosom" was simply "reclining next to" Jesus, with no homoerotic implication. Gagnon argued: "the idea that Jesus was a homosexual or engaged in homosexual acts is complete nonsense" that no "serious biblical scholar" had ever proposed (Ostling 2003).
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(17). The jews, who are cursed by God for doing sodomy, mistakenly believe that it was germs in the anus and rectum that caused them to become unhealthy. Because this scene involves anal sex, it is no doubt that Rice cons Obama into losing h/is sexual function by having h/im insert his penis into h/er anus and rectum. This is part of h/er being a spider, “sp” meaning to “flip” the m/an, stealing the phallus, by destroying h/is penis. How is Obama an evil man, deserving this punishment from the kami Inari? Perhaps Steed’s "disappearance" gives a clue: Steed was arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and, although h/e posted the $500,000 bond, with $50,000 cash, h/e did not show up for h/is trial date in 2001.
(18). How exactly does this result in Obama “losing” the phallus? I don’t know, I think it’s just a very nerdy and indeed neutered conception of sexuality. Any guy would quickly recover from any ego damage, and get more practice. Yet in the Conned-Whore-Lesbo-Lice & Co.’s understanding, Condoleezza Rice now has the phallus, and can run with it, taking it to lesbian “performances” and thereby burying Barack in emasculation.
(19). The “burning” of the man’s penis is done by superimposing a clitoris or a penis onto the man’s penis. Other ways the man is victimized include “probing “the man’s anus, damaging the man’s testicles, harming the man’s body in other ways, having malakoi kouros “girls” give the man a venereal disease, etc.
(20). Dictionary: phallus (făl'əs)
n., pl. phal•li (făl'ī') or phal•lus•es.
1. Anatomy.
The penis.
The sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris.
2. A representation of the penis and testes as an embodiment of generative power.
3. The immature penis considered in psychoanalysis as the libidinal object of infantile sexuality in the male.
See: http://www.answers.com/phallus
(21). Why the jews? Because the jews are the only group that hate all the rest of those on the planet, and even hate the planet Earth, in the sense that they hate Mother Nature. Why do the aliens need a vehicle at all, why don’t they just take control of the Earth themselves? Because the jews are from the planet Earth, and if the aliens can use the jews to colonize the Earth, the colonization is held to be legitimate by the actions and beliefs of Human Beings.
The terrorist state of Israel is the condition for the possibility of the aliens colonizing Earth, because it is the colonization of a Native People's land by others of the Earth. If Human Beings accept this, then they can have their own land, anywhere on Earth, colonized by aliens. This colonization is with the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama ZOG Department of State.
(22). Condoleezza Rice may be based on Diana in the T.V. series V, which had a 4 and a 10 hour miniseries, and 19 weekly episodes which ran from 10/26/84 to 3/22/85. The series has several English actresses, including one who is superior to Diana (Diana might represent Princess Diana), the character Pamela, who might represent Queen Elizabeth II, who is played by Sarah Douglas, who might have something to do with Sarah Ferguson. Diana murders Pamela in the miniseries, for want of power.
See:
http://thevisitors.info/visit...
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3...
http://www.uar.com.au/uar/bad...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://www.warnervideo.com/vd...
http://thevisitors.info/episo...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.prairieden.com/int...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(23). Does Barack Obama have to win the election for Condoleezza Rice to keep the phallus? Certainly the jews needed Condoleezza Rice to win to keep intact the delusion that the inverted “second coming” of the retard Joseph Smith, Jr., who prepared the inverted LDS/LSD (a) “Restoration” of the anti-christ, the abominable alien inversion of God, “Inari Vachs” Condoleezza Rice, with the “War on Terror”. With Condoleezza Rice finished, the jews lost all the power they had worldwide.
Notes:
(a). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(24). See: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.e...
(25). I calculated 612 for Maimonides. Subtracting this from 666, gives 54, the numerical value for the letter I. Because the ram bam is an aI, which means not an I, it may be that the “I Maimonides” means that Maimonides is not an I (a). In this case aI would mean not or without I, with a having the meaning un, which means not, non, opposite of, contrary to.
This is the inversion of 1, which is THE NUMBER OF UNITY. Father. Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. Ephesians 4:5 "one Lord, one faith, one baptism."
Notes:
(a). In Isopsephia, I believe the second vowel of a dipthong is not given any value. In Maimonides, the second vowel of the dipthong ai is i.
Main Entry:
2a-
Pronunciation:
ā also a or ä
Variant(s):
or an- an
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Latin & Greek; Latin, from Greek — more at UN-
: not : without —a- before consonants other than h and sometimes even before h, an- before vowels and usually before h
Main Entry:
1un-
Pronunciation:
ən, often ən before -stressed syllable
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German un- un-, Latin in-, Greek a-, an-, Old English ne not — more at NO
1 : not : IN-, NON- —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles, in nouns formed from nouns , and rarely in verbs formed from verbs —sometimes in words that have a meaning that merely negates that of the base word and are thereby distinguished from words that prefix in- or a variant of it (as im-) to the same base word and have a meaning positively opposite to that of the base word 2 : opposite of : contrary to —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles and in nouns formed from nouns
This would also explain why Moses Maimonides gave itself the name “the ram bam”, from the initials of the words Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon. Maimonides hoped to be the aI of all aIs.
What exactly is that? M A I M O N I D E S: M A I, man’s a, or rectum, anus, and large intestine, is who Maimonides is; M O, an mo, because the a is an o, or hole; N, which is the 14th letter of the alphabet, F O U R T E E N, the ma is an fo, or f--- hole, I D, Maimonides is D, the fourth letter of the alphabet, F O U R; E S, E, the fifth letter of the alphabet, F I V E, Maimonides is F-ed “tu tu”, and S, which is the nineteenth letter of the alphabet, 19 or A I.
So, as you can see, Maimonides is the leader of the Pharisees, who are the leaders of the jews; and all the Pharisees lay (a) together in the temple, and the name Maimonides signifies this, the practice of sodomy.
Notes:
(a). See: http://web.ku.edu/~edit/lie.h...
(26). Why and how are the extra-terrestrial aliens under the control and direction of the ram bam? I only know of two extra-terrestrial aliens that are here on the Earth. They are Condoleezza Rice and Ari Fleisher. These two aliens were born here on the Earth, so as to make them “naturalized” “mixed-race” sodomite/aliens. Ari Fleisher was born and raised a jew, but I don’t know if it’s an In Vitro, as jews often are, or not. Same with Condoleezza Rice, although I’m not sure if this fact is widely known.
I’m not saying aliens can be “naturalized”, they cannot be. Because the jews are cursed by God, they are not members of the Human Race, and are instead correctly thought of as a cursed “race”. What if they got a hold of some uncursed genetic material and made a recombinant DNA body, like that of Inari Vachs? Still, because it is an alien, it cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”. What if a jew did this? Still, the jew is a sodomite, and cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”.
So, what is the place of the aliens within judaism? Because judaism is almost entirely run by a neural-network “system”, it is not as if the aliens have any autonomy. Furthermore, the network indicates the will of the jews, and this is largely controlled by the ram bam, who used the network to “thunk” the group mind of zombie shit-for-brains.
So, while you might think the aliens made provision for some superiority of those they wanted “naturalized”, it doesn’t appear to be the case. (more)
or
