SodaHead - SMOKEY's Blog
http://www.sodahead.com/blogs/feeds/user/854252/atom/
http://www.sodahead.com/images/SodaheadBlacklogo_small.gif
SMOKEY's Blog @ SodaHead.com
Copyright © 2007 SodaHead.com All Rights Reserved2009-08-14T02:00:40Z
SMOKEY
The goal of the conservatives-Remember how they governed ?
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/131211
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/131211/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
The whole goal of the Repugnants is to stop progress.
Stall and have nothing better nor change. Jimmy Carter only lasted one term because he
Did not follow thru on his agenda.
They are trying to do the same to President Obama.
The Repugnants only want Power neither cooperation nor bipartisanship.
Wake up to reality. They set the stage and willfully allowed the bottom to fall out of our morality and our economy all for their selfish personal goals and ambitions.
If the government is not working for the American people, you can bet the Repugnants are in control.
The result of the last 8 years has thrown the working men and women and the families of this Great nation into the streets and into Tent cities on the outskirts of cities
The shame is that of the Republican Party and the conservative movement
And we all must never forget, /The Party the ideology that literally brought our Country to its Knees
Is that of the Conservative Movement.
2009-08-14T02:00:40Z
SMOKEY
WTF- HE CALLED HER LATINO "KKK" HOW SICK ARE WE REALLY
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/83445
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/83445/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
<A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/28/tancredo-claims-sotomayor_n_208831.html#postComment" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/28/tancredo-claims-soto...</A>
Given the very real horrors the KKK, actually initiated performed advocated and made infamous.
I believe any mention of them should really be met with harsh and cruel punishment.
The KKK cut babies out of mothers stomachs, hung innocent women men and children for the sport of it. Cut babies out of mothers stomachs,
Tortured generations of African Americans in an attempt to keep them "in their place"
The death toll from the KKK will never be counted accurately nor with the atrocities they performed be accurately told because they are an affront to every human
And the comparison falls on def ears in my case
Because living in the south even today, especially today I live with the very real fear, that some good ole boys will take out on me, their hatred for all people of color. And If I am not alert and aware, my kids will not see their father again.......
So really the whole "Latino KKk" thing is a joke a sick inhuman joke and should not be tolerated
But this is American Television, it has no brains and no morals at least not any more.
2009-05-29T14:12:28Z
SMOKEY
mancow Water boarded
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/80879
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/80879/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
mancow Water boarded
<A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/mancow-waterboarded-video_n_206906.html#postComment" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/22/mancow-waterboarded-...</A>
I appreciate that he participated in the experiment!
And that he told the truth about the experience!
Yes this enhanced interrogation technique called, Water boarding
IT TORTURE
NOW CAN PEOPLE STOP DEFENDING THIS HORRIFFIC ACT !
At the very least, I mean the rest of the world must think we all are completely out of our minds!
Our news can be seen worldwide and they keep putting these people, (no names) on who defend this action, and who actually say on national TV, they would do it again !
Don't people realize that if this is truly the case and we do not denounce these types of acts and participate in them ourselves? We do not need to fight Radical Terrorist
Because that means We have Ourselves Become Radical Terrorist
Pls Stop
We Are Supposed to Be Better Than This BY LEAPS AND BOUNDS!!
2009-05-24T05:25:33Z
SMOKEY
A Serious Question?
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/80853
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/80853/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
Someone pls answer
In light of the fact that our nation is EVEN HAVING A DEBATE on Torture Tactics, which in the evolution of our nation was deemed illegal decades ago. Which we have ever since proclaimed to be a better nation because of these moral decisions of our forefathers and our proposed dedication to the rule of laws that are fair for All Americans!
Knowing we are not perfect, but ever striving to be a perfect nation
Knowing we have great challenges, but continuing to face those challenges, and working to make our society a more fairer society
In light of all these great overarching ideals that really do make us the beacon of light in the darkness that is Purely The American Dream!
Does the fact that we are even having this debate really mean that Bin Laden achieved his goal of the crippling of our nation a driving US all of US toward self destruction!
that is the question
I believe that we are too close to the edge, and that the decisions we make in the next few years will truly determine if the goal of that Man, will end up being self fulfilling
2009-05-24T05:02:04Z
SMOKEY
Press Conference 2 media Spin !
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/52013
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/52013/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
The spin on this is horrible and unfair. that cnn reporter asked a two part 7 minute question to which the President gave a thoughtful and detailed answer. The for the 2nd or third time this reporter asked again about the days between the announcement of the bonuses being paid an the President and the Treasury Secretary coming out in anger against the bonuses.
"He ask why the lag in time from announcement to response form the white house.
He was intentionally trying to trip up the President or catch him with a bogus headline moment.
President Obama was up to the task and answered this kid question as an adult.
"I like to know what I am talking about before I speak !"
it is such a commonsense fact that the idea of him having to actually say it to stave off this reporters false outrage was even more nutty. then cnn tried to say he dodged the question, not mentioning it was the 2nd or 3rd time he had been asked, nor making any mention of how complex the previous question had been and how well it was replied too by President Obama !
I will say lastly that your take that Obama's response in any way was a knock on Cuomo, is completely off base. He was responding to the reporter and his false irritation that the President had not gotten to the first part of his two part question. so he asked again a bit irritated though the reporter had no real reason to be irritated the President had jsut given a 3 minute response to a complex question about our nations future!
The reported asked the question in an effort to trip up the President, and The President handled it greatly. I mean these complainers are the same ones who allowed Bush to give nonsense answers, or no answer for 8 years actually longer, because he did not answer questions when he was running for president either.
But they are holding President Obama to the highest of high standards, if he slips even a lil they pounce on him for days on end about 5 seconds of a 30 minute speech. I mean really the hypocrarcy. We are only 60 days in and great strides have been made, I
wonder if the fall out would have been as bad, if the former President had made bold moves for the betterment of all Americans in his final 90 days in office.
makes you go Hummnnn !!
But bush didn't do a darn thing, he went on vacation as citizens lost their homes and jobs by the millions.
President Obama is working for a better future for All Americans, whether you like him or not !
2009-03-26T05:04:42Z
SMOKEY
JINDAL, OUT OF TOUCH W REALITY AGAIN !
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/52010
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/52010/"></a>
<b>+2 raves</b>
</div>
<A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/24/bobby-jindal-to-speak-at-_n_178591.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/24/bobby-jindal-to-spea...</A>
Jindal IS PROVEN TO BE A HACK and is as out of touch as his party.
We are not stupid; the RNC has no plan except to oppose the Presidents plans to fix the mess that the darn RNC left our nation in.
They have no alternative budget, not alternative plan for fixing banking they broke banking and investments thru years of de regulation, tot he point that the actions that have brought our nation to its knees and begging China for money, all I want is for the RNC to shut up and sit in the corner and watch a grown man handle this.
The RNC took the keys to the castle 14 years ago and had a freaking frat party, and our nation suffers greatly for their irresponsibility, and lack of governance capability. Isn’t it obvious, by the actions of the Palin’s, Jindals of our land, no investment in education, record poverty and unemployment in their states even before the meltdown?
I mean really, isn't their model the same as the GW Bush model of American destruction thru distraction politics and ideological feeding frenzies. They send the ignorant into argue the petty while their leaders meet in the back room plotting our demise.
2009-03-26T04:56:38Z
SMOKEY
PRO LIFERS KILL DOCTORS AND BLOW UP CLINICS -THANKS MCCAIN
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19729
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19729/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
MCCAIN IS PRO LIFE
HE IS SUPPROTED BY DOMESTIC TERROIST AND SUPPROTS THEIR ACTIONS.
THIS IS HODGE PODGE BUT I WILL COEM BACK BETTER
THESE GUYS ARE WORKING MY LAST NERVE WITH THIS MESS.
AND THEY PUT IT OUT WITHOUT EVEN REVIEWING IT.
Well I guess it is ok to support people who shoot doctors and blow up abortion clinics in the name of Pro Life.
NOT ONLY IS THEI THE RNC AS A WHOLE IT IS ALSO JOHN SIDNEY MCCAIN.
He one of his delegates at the convention this year, supported and praised a woman convicted of shooting a doctor at an abortion clinic in both arms. The judge in the case however, stated that this lady due to her actions deserved the label DOMESTIC TERRORIST.
LOOK IT UP.
MCCAIN AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM
BUT I GUESS SINCE IT WAS AN ABORTION CLINIC THE RNC THINKS THAT IS OK.
THE Annenberg 'S ARE republicans WHO WORKED FOR Ronald Regan AND ARE LISTED AS CURRENT SUPPORTERS OF john McCain
YOU DUMB ASS MCCAIN IS SUPPORTED BY THE SAME PEOPLE AND FOUNDATION THAT HIRED BOTH OBAMA AND AYERS TO HELP WITH EDUCATIONAL ISSUES
GET A LIFE
(OOHH MCCAIN SUPPORTS TWO DOMESTIC TERRORIST ABORTION CLINIC SHOOTERS AND AYERS)
FREAKIN BEAVIS
2008-10-09T20:55:34Z
SMOKEY
DOMESTIC TERRORIST SHOOT DOCTORS & SUPPORTED BY MCCAIN
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19725
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19725/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
Well I guess it is ok to support people who shoot doctors and blow up abortion clinics in the name of Pro Life.
NOT ONLY IS THEI THE RNC AS A WHOLE IT IS ALSO JOHN SIDNEY MCCAIN.
He one of his delegates at the convention this year, supported and praised a woman convicted of shooting a doctor at an abortion clinic in both arms. The judge in the case however, stated that this lady due to her actions deserved the label DOMESTIC TERRORIST.
LOOK IT UP.
MCCAIN AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM
BUT I GUESS SINCE IT WAS AN ABORTION CLINIC THE RNC THINKS THAT IS OK.
THE Annenberg 'S ARE republicans WHO WORKED FOR Ronald Regan AND ARE LISTED AS CURRENT SUPPORTERS OF john McCain
YOU DUMB ASS MCCAIN IS SUPPORTED BY THE SAME PEOPLE AND FOUNDATION THAT HIRED BOTH OBAMA AND AYERS TO HELP WITH EDUCATIONAL ISSUES
GET A LIFE
(OOHH MCCAIN SUPPORTS TWO DOMESTIC TERRORIST ABORTION CLINIC SHOOTERS AND AYERS)
FREAKIN BEAVIS
2008-10-09T20:33:59Z
SMOKEY
VOTERS PURGES IN BATTLEGROUND STATES
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19679
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19679/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
They’re trying to keep people from voting…AGAIN
<A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081009/ap_on_el_ge/voter_purges;_ylt=AhqLzebpf297xnfloqIwsaas0NUE" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081009/ap_on_el_ge/voter_purges;...</A>
Thu Oct 9, 1:07 AM ET
NEW YORK - Tens of thousands of eligible voters have been removed from rolls or blocked from registering in at least six swing states, and the voters' exclusion appears to violate federal law, according to a published report.
The New York Times based its findings on reviews of state records and Social Security data.
The Times said voters appear to have been purged by mistake and not because of any intentional violations by election officials or coordinated efforts by any party.
States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 by removing the names of voters who should no longer be listed. But for every voter added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have removed two, a review of the records shows.
The newspaper said it identified apparent problems in Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina. It says some states are improperly using Social Security data to verify new voters' registration applications, and others may have broken rules that govern removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election.
Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election officials, so any closer screening of new applications may affect their party's supporters disproportionately, the Times said.
The result is that on Election Day, voters who have been removed from the rolls could show up and be challenged by political party officials or election workers.
The six states seem to have violated federal law in two ways. Some are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.
And some of the states are improperly using Social Security data to verify registration applications for new voters, the newspaper reported.
"Just as voting machines were the major issue that came out of the 2000 presidential election and provisional ballots were the big issue from 2004, voter registration and these statewide lists will be the top concern this year," said Daniel P. Tokaji, a law professor at Ohio State University.
2008-10-09T15:57:23Z
SMOKEY
VOTER PURGES IN 6 BATTLEGROUND STATES WATCH OUT
http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19678
<div align="left"><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/854252/">
<img src="http://images.sodahead.com/images/profiles/0/0/0/8/5/4/2/5/2/profiles_shorttermdisabilitytime_4124_805098_media_small.jpeg" align="middle" border="0" alt="SMOKEY"/>
<small>SMOKEY</small></a>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19678/"></a>
<b>0 raves</b>
</div>
They’re trying to keep people from voting…AGAIN
<A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081009/ap_on_el_ge/voter_purges;_ylt=AhqLzebpf297xnfloqIwsaas0NUE" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081009/ap_on_el_ge/voter_purges;...</A>
Thu Oct 9, 1:07 AM ET
NEW YORK - Tens of thousands of eligible voters have been removed from rolls or blocked from registering in at least six swing states, and the voters' exclusion appears to violate federal law, according to a published report.
The New York Times based its findings on reviews of state records and Social Security data.
The Times said voters appear to have been purged by mistake and not because of any intentional violations by election officials or coordinated efforts by any party.
States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 by removing the names of voters who should no longer be listed. But for every voter added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have removed two, a review of the records shows.
The newspaper said it identified apparent problems in Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina. It says some states are improperly using Social Security data to verify new voters' registration applications, and others may have broken rules that govern removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election.
Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election officials, so any closer screening of new applications may affect their party's supporters disproportionately, the Times said.
The result is that on Election Day, voters who have been removed from the rolls could show up and be challenged by political party officials or election workers.
The six states seem to have violated federal law in two ways. Some are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.
And some of the states are improperly using Social Security data to verify registration applications for new voters, the newspaper reported.
"Just as voting machines were the major issue that came out of the 2000 presidential election and provisional ballots were the big issue from 2004, voter registration and these statewide lists will be the top concern this year," said Daniel P. Tokaji, a law professor at Ohio State University.
2008-10-09T15:56:37Z
SMOKEY