As they used to say on LAUGH IN (I think I am dating myself) "Verrrrrrry Interesttttting!
'
RWD
Second Source Confirms Obama's *Socialist Party Membership*
.
Cross posted from: PoliticallyDrunk.blogspot.com
2nd Source Confirms Obama Socialist Party Membership, Plus How They Infiltrated Democratic Party
Jarid Brown - October 9th, 2008
Yesterday, we disclosed 2 documents, a archived press release from the New Party in 1996 and an archived Populist Progressive article, both confirming Barack Obama's membership in the Socialist Affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America. On Wednesday, I went hunting for additional sources...
1996 Election Update From The Columbus Free Post
//"The first NP member heads to Congress, as Danny Davis wins an overwhelming 85% victory yesterday (he got a higher percentage of the vote in that district than the President). NP member and State Senate candidate Barack Obama won uncontested. Interestingly, it appears that the local Democratic machine is trying to distance itself from our folks."//
Link To Columbus Free Post Article
This revelation has left many people wondering how this could be since Obama ran under the Democratic Party banner during the 1996 Election. As a result, we want to shed insider light on how the New Party planned their takeover of the Democratic Party.
From The Happy Birthday Update Published By The New Party in 1997:
//"... the New Party would remain independent of the Democratic Party -- but without undermining the Democrats. The New Party's program for a new majority would, as Todd Gutlin puts it, center around an "old fashioned" concern for issues like living wages.
...the New Party's founders suggest, the left needs an organization that straddles the inside-outside fence. If the U.S. left is ever to make a meaningful decision on the third-party-vs.-Dems question, they propose, it must first take on the task of grassroots power-building.
Thus, most of the New Party's work has been in local politics, where its candidates need no party label -- just the activist energy it takes to win office. The party's strategy has been to build political organizations in a few targeted cities, working closely with labor and community organizations. Chapters run candidates only where they have a real chance of winning, combine campaign work with organizing and education, and refuse to spoil elections by stealing votes from the better of two major party candidates.
But to grow past the local level, something more is needed...
...Until major changes in the legal structure of the U.S. politics happen, we're stuck with a two-party system, and progressives -- if they want to win many elections -- will have to run, and vote, Democrat.
But without fusion, the New Party is not likely to have the capacity to swing higher level elections any time soon, inside or outside the Democratic Party. For now the New Party is nothing more -- and nothing less -- than a network of local labor-community political organizations. These organizations can, from time to time, move their political muscle and know-how into Democratic primaries to back progressive candidates for state legislature and even Congress, but do not have the size or clout to field their own candidates for the Senate, the Governor's office, or the White House."//
Full Article Here
Now you're beginning to understand how Obama, The New Party and ACORN have hijacked the Democratic Party. Here is more, a tell all article published by a New Party Member in Missoula, Montana in 1997:
//"As our party(ies) grow, and build a strong base of support, we should move up in electoral space to higher level offices...
...Chapters generally require endorsed candidates to sign a contract, with requirements that they be NP members, identify as such, support the NP principles and program, and work to build NP chapters...
...For the New Party, whether progressives should run as Democrats is a tactical, not ideological, question...
...We rely on the good judgment of our local organizers and leadership to determine whether candidates should run as independents or inside Democratic primaries, or as fusion challengers. Regardless of whether our candidates run as "non-partisan" (in fact, the vast majority of our candidates, as we're generally running in local elections which are usually non-partisan), "New Party Democrats" (inside Dem Primaries), or independents, they all are New Party members, identify as such, and work to help build local independent political power..."//
Link To Article
Now you're starting to see the light of how dangerous this organization is, how it has hijacked the Democratic Party, and how similar their goals for achieving electoral success are to another 80 years old Socialist Organization that used the same bottom-up populist approach to overthrowing a democratic government. Can anyone guess what National Socialist Organization that was?
Another Interesting Obama Speech No One Has Heard About:
Chicago DSA Press Release New Ground 69:
//"Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy."//
Link To Article Look Under The Endorsements Section
What Is The YDS?
Youth Democratic Socialists - Interesting, Isn't It?
Why is this just now becoming uncovered?
These organizations with the help of the Obama Campaign have been scrubbing their sites for months to limit potential disclosure of Obama's nefarious roots. Meanwhile Google, in a celebration of it's 10th anniversary, announced at the end of September that were making their very first Internet index available for a 1 month period. www.google.com/search2001.html
This index is unscrubbed, yet the downside is that the index is limited. Upon finding information, Google will post the original link, along with a reference to the Internet Archives link. However, IA must have archived the page for it to show up. So Search and Search Fast Before It Is Shut Down.
See Our Original Article Web Archives Confirms Obama As Member Of Socialist New Party
Be Sure To DIGG UP The Original Article Here
Jarid Brown
October 9th, 2008
http://politicallydrunk.blogspot.com/2008/10/2nd-source-confi...
.
Cross posted from: PoliticallyDrunk.blogspot.com
2nd Source Confirms Obama Socialist Party Membership, Plus How They Infiltrated Democratic Party
Jarid Brown - October 9th, 2008
Yesterday, we disclosed 2 documents, a archived press release from the New Party in 1996 and an archived Populist Progressive article, both confirming Barack Obama's membership in the Socialist Affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America. On Wednesday, I went hunting for additional sources...
1996 Election Update From The Columbus Free Post
//"The first NP member heads to Congress, as Danny Davis wins an overwhelming 85% victory yesterday (he got a higher percentage of the vote in that district than the President). NP member and State Senate candidate Barack Obama won uncontested. Interestingly, it appears that the local Democratic machine is trying to distance itself from our folks."//
Link To Columbus Free Post Article
This revelation has left many people wondering how this could be since Obama ran under the Democratic Party banner during the 1996 Election. As a result, we want to shed insider light on how the New Party planned their takeover of the Democratic Party.
From The Happy Birthday Update Published By The New Party in 1997:
//"... the New Party would remain independent of the Democratic Party -- but without undermining the Democrats. The New Party's program for a new majority would, as Todd Gutlin puts it, center around an "old fashioned" concern for issues like living wages.
...the New Party's founders suggest, the left needs an organization that straddles the inside-outside fence. If the U.S. left is ever to make a meaningful decision on the third-party-vs.-Dems question, they propose, it must first take on the task of grassroots power-building.
Thus, most of the New Party's work has been in local politics, where its candidates need no party label -- just the activist energy it takes to win office. The party's strategy has been to build political organizations in a few targeted cities, working closely with labor and community organizations. Chapters run candidates only where they have a real chance of winning, combine campaign work with organizing and education, and refuse to spoil elections by stealing votes from the better of two major party candidates.
But to grow past the local level, something more is needed...
...Until major changes in the legal structure of the U.S. politics happen, we're stuck with a two-party system, and progressives -- if they want to win many elections -- will have to run, and vote, Democrat.
But without fusion, the New Party is not likely to have the capacity to swing higher level elections any time soon, inside or outside the Democratic Party. For now the New Party is nothing more -- and nothing less -- than a network of local labor-community political organizations. These organizations can, from time to time, move their political muscle and know-how into Democratic primaries to back progressive candidates for state legislature and even Congress, but do not have the size or clout to field their own candidates for the Senate, the Governor's office, or the White House."//
Full Article Here
Now you're beginning to understand how Obama, The New Party and ACORN have hijacked the Democratic Party. Here is more, a tell all article published by a New Party Member in Missoula, Montana in 1997:
//"As our party(ies) grow, and build a strong base of support, we should move up in electoral space to higher level offices...
...Chapters generally require endorsed candidates to sign a contract, with requirements that they be NP members, identify as such, support the NP principles and program, and work to build NP chapters...
...For the New Party, whether progressives should run as Democrats is a tactical, not ideological, question...
...We rely on the good judgment of our local organizers and leadership to determine whether candidates should run as independents or inside Democratic primaries, or as fusion challengers. Regardless of whether our candidates run as "non-partisan" (in fact, the vast majority of our candidates, as we're generally running in local elections which are usually non-partisan), "New Party Democrats" (inside Dem Primaries), or independents, they all are New Party members, identify as such, and work to help build local independent political power..."//
Link To Article
Now you're starting to see the light of how dangerous this organization is, how it has hijacked the Democratic Party, and how similar their goals for achieving electoral success are to another 80 years old Socialist Organization that used the same bottom-up populist approach to overthrowing a democratic government. Can anyone guess what National Socialist Organization that was?
Another Interesting Obama Speech No One Has Heard About:
Chicago DSA Press Release New Ground 69:
//"Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy."//
Link To Article Look Under The Endorsements Section
What Is The YDS?
Youth Democratic Socialists - Interesting, Isn't It?
Why is this just now becoming uncovered?
These organizations with the help of the Obama Campaign have been scrubbing their sites for months to limit potential disclosure of Obama's nefarious roots. Meanwhile Google, in a celebration of it's 10th anniversary, announced at the end of September that were making their very first Internet index available for a 1 month period. www.google.com/search2001.html
This index is unscrubbed, yet the downside is that the index is limited. Upon finding information, Google will post the original link, along with a reference to the Internet Archives link. However, IA must have archived the page for it to show up. So Search and Search Fast Before It Is Shut Down.
See Our Original Article Web Archives Confirms Obama As Member Of Socialist New Party
Be Sure To DIGG UP The Original Article Here
Jarid Brown
October 9th, 2008
http://politicallydrunk.blogspot.com/2008/10/2nd-source-confi...
.
Sort By:
Raves
|
Date
-
raves +2 posted Oct 12, 2008 07:57PM GMT
-
raves +3 posted Oct 12, 2008 07:51PM GMT
-
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 04:20AM GMT
-
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 02:10PM GMTHa Ha!
Yup! That;s Artie Johnsoin alright!
RWD -
raves +2 posted Oct 12, 2008 04:48PM GMT
-
raves +4 posted Oct 12, 2008 01:02PM GMTThanks heart~ BO-RacePlayingSocialist's !
I guess we have to go and find our own information on this guy since most of the media sweep things like this under their rug. I don't even watch their news broadcasts anymore.
A good post! -
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 04:28AM GMTThanks... and you can call me heart! That last part of my name is like a barometer and changes like the wind! =) He IS a race playing socialist... but 'evil-me' just added that to, hopefully, make a few of his fans twitch!! =)
-
raves +5 posted Oct 11, 2008 10:09PM GMTYou can see socialism written all over them..just by what they tolerate, what they stand for, what they say, what they believe in, and what they do. Most Americans are smart and pay careful attention to what is going on. It's up to us to try to fix this nation and to keep it free. For most of us and our country we have God on our side. If Obama "steals the election" with his corrupt Acorn votes, then the rest of the country who supports him will find out what most of us already know and it will be terrible lesson to live through.
-
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 04:13AM GMTI hope to GOD we make it through 4 years if that happens!! I am so scared about what might happen if he gets in.
Will Obama, IF he gets elected, go so far that we have to have another civil war to get back to a free America? I'll be damned if I let go of MY freedom! -
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 04:37AM GMTNo... it won't be so swift or obvious. But it will be sure; a sure decline into even more of a welfare state. With Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, and especially if they win filibuster-proof majorities, it will be like Christmas for the Liberals. We will be crippled with Pelosi style my-way-or-no-way legislation. Their 'Plan(s) for America' will not stimulate growth, increase jobs or support small businesses. It is a recipe for disaster but it will be like kudzu vine, slow and invasive and almost impossible to stop.
-
raves +2 Oct 14, 2008 05:23AM GMTI HATE kudzu!
This really is some scary shit. -
raves +6 posted Oct 11, 2008 09:17PM GMT
-
raves +6 Oct 12, 2008 07:04AM GMTI am voting for John McCain too, Pet.... I am anxious for early voting to start because I want to go and get my vote in. I do not want to see our country turned into a socialistic country.... I would leave the country if Obucky were to win other than I cannot leave my Grandmother.... that would scare the hell out of me. I would be afraid that he would pass a law to euthanize old people.
-
raves +5 Oct 12, 2008 07:43AM GMTAngie,
The more I learn about Obaba and his alignments with crooks, washed-out domestic terrorist, a dictator cousin in Kenya. The more I am starting to believe that he is going to try his to steal this election, at all cost. All the
he has given to ACORN. ACORN backing up Obaba and ACORN with all these fraudulent voter registrations. This can't be allowed to happen.
-
raves +5 Oct 12, 2008 09:20AM GMTIt sure looks like he is going to try. I hope that when people go into that booth to vote, they will vote with their brains and not let this happen.
-
raves +3 Oct 14, 2008 04:16AM GMTI hope so too. Again, this is REAL HOPE. Not that empty crap he spouts.
-
raves +3 Oct 14, 2008 04:14AM GMTLOL, I just made a post then read yours, look up at my other post :O)
-
raves +5 posted Oct 11, 2008 08:47PM GMTTime has come our troop's should be brought home USA is going to need them here to st

glitter-graphics.comop Obama and his supporter's .NOBAMA NO WAY NO HOW. -
raves +6 posted Oct 11, 2008 08:35PM GMTAnother topic to bring up at McCain's "last chance" debate! This is a RELEVANT issue, and must come out!!
I don't think most people know just how radical Obama is... because if they really knew?.... GAME OVER! -
raves +5 Oct 11, 2008 08:44PM GMTwrite to the rnc ,i did this morning and complained!
Archives

RWD