Palin racist? Kinda looks like it
Analysis: Palin's words carry racial tinge
By Douglass K. Daniel / Associated Press
WASHINGTON - By claiming that Democrat Barack Obama is "palling around with terrorists" and doesn't see the U.S. like other Americans, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin targeted key goals for a faltering campaign.
And though she may have scored a political hit each time, her attack was unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext that John McCain himself may come to regret.
First, Palin's attack shows that her energetic debate with rival Joe Biden may be just the beginning, not the end, of a sharpened role in the battle to win the presidency.
"Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country," Palin told a group of donors in Englewood, Colo. A deliberate attempt to smear Obama, McCain's ticket-mate echoed the line at three separate events Saturday.
"This is not a man who sees America like you and I see America," she said. "We see America as a force of good in this world. We see an America of exceptionalism."
Her reference to Obama's relationship with William Ayers, a member of the Vietnam-era Weather Underground, was exaggerated at best if not outright false. No evidence shows they were "pals" or even close when they worked on community boards years ago and Ayers hosted a political event for Obama early in his career.
Obama, who was a child when the Weathermen were planting bombs, has denounced Ayers' radical views and actions.
With her criticism, Palin is taking on the running mate's traditional role of attacker, said Rich Galen, a Republican strategist.
"There appears to be a newfound sense of confidence in Sarah Palin as a candidate, given her performance the other night," Galen said. "I think that they are comfortable enough with her now that she's got the standing with the electorate to take off after Obama."
Second, Palin's incendiary charge draws media and voter attention away from the worsening economy. It also comes after McCain supported a pork-laden Wall Street bailout plan in spite of conservative anger and his own misgivings.
"It's a giant changing of the subject," said Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist. "The problem is the messenger. If you want to start throwing fire bombs, you don't send out the fluffy bunny to do it. I think people don't take Sarah Palin seriously."
The larger purpose behind Palin's broadside is to reintroduce the question of Obama's associations. Millions of voters, many of them open to being swayed to one side or the other, are starting to pay attention to an election a month away.
For the McCain campaign, that makes Obama's ties to Ayers as well as convicted felon Antoin "Tony" Rezko and the controversial minister Jeremiah Wright ripe for renewed criticism. And Palin brings a fresh voice to the argument.
Effective character attacks have come earlier in campaigns. In June 1988, Republican George H.W. Bush criticized Democrat Michael Dukakis over the furlough granted to Willie Horton, a convicted murderer who then raped a woman and stabbed her companion. Related TV ads followed in September and October.
The Vietnam-era Swift Boat veterans who attacked Democrat John Kerry's war record started in the spring of 2004 and gained traction in late summer.
"The four weeks that are left are an eternity. There's plenty of time in the campaign," said Republican strategist Joe Gaylord. "I think it is a legitimate strategy to talk about Obama and to talk about his background and who he pals around with."
Palin's words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee "palling around" with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn't see their America?
In a post-Sept. 11 America, terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims, not the homegrown anarchists of Ayers' day 40 years ago. With Obama a relative unknown when he began his campaign, the Internet hummed with false e-mails about ties to radical Islam of a foreign-born candidate.
Whether intended or not by the McCain campaign, portraying Obama as "not like us" is another potential appeal to racism. It suggests that the Hawaiian-born Christian is, at heart, un-American.
Palin's words raise questions about whether the last month of the campaign will feature a new focus by McCain's camp on Obama's associations with Ayers, Rezko and Wright.
Bringing up Wright would contradict McCain's promise that Obama's former pastor is was off-limits. McCain, the victim himself of racially-tinged smear campaign in 2000, has promised a new kind of politics.
But the fact is that allowing racism to creep into the discussion serves a purpose for McCain. As the fallout from Wright's sermons showed earlier this year, forcing Obama to abandon issues to talk about race leads to unresolved arguments about America's promise to treat all people equally.
John McCain occasionally looks back on decisions with regret. He has apologized for opposing a holiday to honor Martin Luther King Jr. He has apologized for refusing to call for the removal of a Confederate flag from South Carolina's Capitol.
When the 2008 campaign is over McCain might regret appeals such as Palin's perhaps more so if he wins.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — Douglass K. Daniel is a writer and editor with the Washington bureau of The Associated Press.
By Douglass K. Daniel / Associated Press
WASHINGTON - By claiming that Democrat Barack Obama is "palling around with terrorists" and doesn't see the U.S. like other Americans, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin targeted key goals for a faltering campaign.
And though she may have scored a political hit each time, her attack was unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext that John McCain himself may come to regret.
First, Palin's attack shows that her energetic debate with rival Joe Biden may be just the beginning, not the end, of a sharpened role in the battle to win the presidency.
"Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country," Palin told a group of donors in Englewood, Colo. A deliberate attempt to smear Obama, McCain's ticket-mate echoed the line at three separate events Saturday.
"This is not a man who sees America like you and I see America," she said. "We see America as a force of good in this world. We see an America of exceptionalism."
Her reference to Obama's relationship with William Ayers, a member of the Vietnam-era Weather Underground, was exaggerated at best if not outright false. No evidence shows they were "pals" or even close when they worked on community boards years ago and Ayers hosted a political event for Obama early in his career.
Obama, who was a child when the Weathermen were planting bombs, has denounced Ayers' radical views and actions.
With her criticism, Palin is taking on the running mate's traditional role of attacker, said Rich Galen, a Republican strategist.
"There appears to be a newfound sense of confidence in Sarah Palin as a candidate, given her performance the other night," Galen said. "I think that they are comfortable enough with her now that she's got the standing with the electorate to take off after Obama."
Second, Palin's incendiary charge draws media and voter attention away from the worsening economy. It also comes after McCain supported a pork-laden Wall Street bailout plan in spite of conservative anger and his own misgivings.
"It's a giant changing of the subject," said Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist. "The problem is the messenger. If you want to start throwing fire bombs, you don't send out the fluffy bunny to do it. I think people don't take Sarah Palin seriously."
The larger purpose behind Palin's broadside is to reintroduce the question of Obama's associations. Millions of voters, many of them open to being swayed to one side or the other, are starting to pay attention to an election a month away.
For the McCain campaign, that makes Obama's ties to Ayers as well as convicted felon Antoin "Tony" Rezko and the controversial minister Jeremiah Wright ripe for renewed criticism. And Palin brings a fresh voice to the argument.
Effective character attacks have come earlier in campaigns. In June 1988, Republican George H.W. Bush criticized Democrat Michael Dukakis over the furlough granted to Willie Horton, a convicted murderer who then raped a woman and stabbed her companion. Related TV ads followed in September and October.
The Vietnam-era Swift Boat veterans who attacked Democrat John Kerry's war record started in the spring of 2004 and gained traction in late summer.
"The four weeks that are left are an eternity. There's plenty of time in the campaign," said Republican strategist Joe Gaylord. "I think it is a legitimate strategy to talk about Obama and to talk about his background and who he pals around with."
Palin's words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee "palling around" with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn't see their America?
In a post-Sept. 11 America, terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims, not the homegrown anarchists of Ayers' day 40 years ago. With Obama a relative unknown when he began his campaign, the Internet hummed with false e-mails about ties to radical Islam of a foreign-born candidate.
Whether intended or not by the McCain campaign, portraying Obama as "not like us" is another potential appeal to racism. It suggests that the Hawaiian-born Christian is, at heart, un-American.
Palin's words raise questions about whether the last month of the campaign will feature a new focus by McCain's camp on Obama's associations with Ayers, Rezko and Wright.
Bringing up Wright would contradict McCain's promise that Obama's former pastor is was off-limits. McCain, the victim himself of racially-tinged smear campaign in 2000, has promised a new kind of politics.
But the fact is that allowing racism to creep into the discussion serves a purpose for McCain. As the fallout from Wright's sermons showed earlier this year, forcing Obama to abandon issues to talk about race leads to unresolved arguments about America's promise to treat all people equally.
John McCain occasionally looks back on decisions with regret. He has apologized for opposing a holiday to honor Martin Luther King Jr. He has apologized for refusing to call for the removal of a Confederate flag from South Carolina's Capitol.
When the 2008 campaign is over McCain might regret appeals such as Palin's perhaps more so if he wins.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — Douglass K. Daniel is a writer and editor with the Washington bureau of The Associated Press.
Sort By:
Raves
|
Date
-
raves +1 posted Oct 09, 2008 01:39AM GMT
-
raves Oct 09, 2008 11:05PM GMTYou didnt and to be honest, the only reason I have not taken this blog down is because of all the poeple who took the time to respond. This blog was a poor choice on my part. Than you for your ever honest comments!!
-
raves +1 Oct 13, 2008 03:42PM GMTNo problem I just have been thinking a lot about that issue. No it wasnt a poor choice on your part you posted what you thought and thats what is all about after all right? ;)
God Bless,
McCain/Palin08
SarahPalinSupporter08 -
raves +2 posted Oct 08, 2008 07:36PM GMTI disagree with you and the author's interpretation of "like us". It does not refer to a racial difference... unless you want it to. She is simply saying that Barack Hussein Obama sees America as an oppurtunist and "pals" around with a white terrorist! Get real and get ready! The main stream media's romance of this sham of a candidate is OVER and the gloves are off. The American people, who don't watch FOX, need to be informed of who BO really is! My grandmother used to say,"When you lie with dogs, you get fleas!" I think everyone deserves to know who the dogs are AND just exactly what kind of fleas OBama's camp has tried to rid theirselves of... Ayres, Wright, Alynslkiism, etc, etc!
Whenever you hear the cry "racism" it is a cry of fear/panic to hide the truth/facts! Just look at O.J.!
-
raves +2 posted Oct 08, 2008 11:37AM GMTNO, she is not a racist. It is simply more evidence that the press will not relent until they have thoroughly destroyed this woman. Why all the hate?
-
raves +3 posted Oct 08, 2008 05:36AM GMTSo any one that criticizes a black person is racist? That's bull and you know it.
-
raves +3 posted Oct 08, 2008 02:54AM GMT
-
raves +2 posted Oct 08, 2008 12:28AM GMTIt is not racist, LOL! O.J. also just tried crying race... that's why I was found guilty!
-
raves +1 Oct 08, 2008 12:58AM GMTGail, what does OJ Simpson, have to do with this election?
-
raves Oct 08, 2008 01:03AM GMTI didnt get it either... is she OJ? :)
-
raves +1 Oct 08, 2008 07:37PM GMTIt just goes to show, Kelly Duh, that when any african american cries race... they're usually guilty!
-
raves +4 posted Oct 07, 2008 10:22PM GMTIf someone doesn't like something they holler 'racist'...
-
raves Oct 07, 2008 10:24PM GMTummmm not true but you are entitled to your ownt thought.
-
raves +1 posted Oct 07, 2008 10:18PM GMTNice post.... less keep up the good work. Less than a month!
Obama / Biden 08 ... the only rational choice -
raves +4 posted Oct 07, 2008 09:22PM GMTKeep trying to make a racial issue where there is none and you will find that people are disgusted with it by election day. The terrorists that were being referred to were Ayers and his wife who happen to be white. If you want to talk about racist, why don't you look at Obama's buddies Wright, Al Sharpton and Farrakahn. And they are anti-Semite as well.
-
raves Oct 07, 2008 10:25PM GMTThis blog is not about those poeple, it is about the racial undertones in Palins speech. Feel free to start your own blog if you so choose.
-
raves +1 Oct 08, 2008 01:24AM GMTAlexis, I noticed that you are ready and able to point out alleged Black racist, and attach them to Obama. I wonder how many times you have readily identified White racist, and attached them to a White candidate.
QUESTION: can you point out some White racist, or are your skills limited to detecting Black racist? -
raves +1 Oct 08, 2008 03:06AM GMTThere are plenty of racists on both sides to go around!!! The question was about racial undertones and I answered it!
-
raves +2 posted Oct 07, 2008 08:01PM GMTThe Times is race baiting. That means, put it out there and see if it sticks. Obviously you think it does. That's good enough for the Times.
-
raves Oct 07, 2008 08:04PM GMTI heard what I heard BEFORE any articles came out.

God Bless,
McCain/Palin 08