WSJ - Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools
Cross posted from: Wall Street Journal - Online
Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools
By Stanley Kurtz - September 23, 2008
Despite having authored two autobiographies, Barack Obama has never written about his most important executive experience. From 1995 to 1999, he led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists.
The CAC was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s. Among other feats, Mr. Ayers and his cohorts bombed the Pentagon, and he has never expressed regret for his actions. Barack Obama's first run for the Illinois State Senate was launched at a 1995 gathering at Mr. Ayers's home.
The Obama campaign has struggled to downplay that association. Last April, Sen. Obama dismissed Mr. Ayers as just "a guy who lives in my neighborhood," and "not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis." Yet documents in the CAC archives make clear that Mr. Ayers and Mr. Obama were partners in the CAC. Those archives are housed in the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago and I've recently spent days looking through them.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was created ostensibly to improve Chicago's public schools. The funding came from a national education initiative by Ambassador Walter Annenberg. In early 1995, Mr. Obama was appointed the first chairman of the board, which handled fiscal matters. Mr. Ayers co-chaired the foundation's other key body, the "Collaborative," which shaped education policy.
The CAC's basic functioning has long been known, because its annual reports, evaluations and some board minutes were public. But the Daley archive contains additional board minutes, the Collaborative minutes, and documentation on the groups that CAC funded and rejected. The Daley archives show that Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda.
One unsettled question is how Mr. Obama, a former community organizer fresh out of law school, could vault to the top of a new foundation? In response to my questions, the Obama campaign issued a statement saying that Mr. Ayers had nothing to do with Obama's "recruitment" to the board. The statement says Deborah Leff and Patricia Albjerg Graham (presidents of other foundations) recruited him. Yet the archives show that, along with Ms. Leff and Ms. Graham, Mr. Ayers was one of a working group of five who assembled the initial board in 1994. Mr. Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval.
The CAC's agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers's educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism. In the mid-1960s, Mr. Ayers taught at a radical alternative school, and served as a community organizer in Cleveland's ghetto.
In works like "City Kids, City Teachers" and "Teaching the Personal and the Political," Mr. Ayers wrote that teachers should be community organizers dedicated to provoking resistance to American racism and oppression. His preferred alternative? "I'm a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist," Mr. Ayers said in an interview in Ron Chepesiuk's, "Sixties Radicals," at about the same time Mr. Ayers was forming CAC.
CAC translated Mr. Ayers's radicalism into practice. Instead of funding schools directly, it required schools to affiliate with "external partners," which actually got the money. Proposals from groups focused on math/science achievement were turned down. Instead CAC disbursed money through various far-left community organizers, such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (or Acorn).
Mr. Obama once conducted "leadership training" seminars with Acorn, and Acorn members also served as volunteers in Mr. Obama's early campaigns. External partners like the South Shore African Village Collaborative and the Dual Language Exchange focused more on political consciousness, Afrocentricity and bilingualism than traditional education. CAC's in-house evaluators comprehensively studied the effects of its grants on the test scores of Chicago public-school students. They found no evidence of educational improvement.
CAC also funded programs designed to promote "leadership" among parents. Ostensibly this was to enable parents to advocate on behalf of their children's education. In practice, it meant funding Mr. Obama's alma mater, the Developing Communities Project, to recruit parents to its overall political agenda. CAC records show that board member Arnold Weber was concerned that parents "organized" by community groups might be viewed by school principals "as a political threat." Mr. Obama arranged meetings with the Collaborative to smooth out Mr. Weber's objections.
The Daley documents show that Mr. Ayers sat as an ex-officio member of the board Mr. Obama chaired through CAC's first year. He also served on the board's governance committee with Mr. Obama, and worked with him to craft CAC bylaws. Mr. Ayers made presentations to board meetings chaired by Mr. Obama. Mr. Ayers spoke for the Collaborative before the board. Likewise, Mr. Obama periodically spoke for the board at meetings of the Collaborative.
The Obama campaign notes that Mr. Ayers attended only six board meetings, and stresses that the Collaborative lost its "operational role" at CAC after the first year. Yet the Collaborative was demoted to a strictly advisory role largely because of ethical concerns, since the projects of Collaborative members were receiving grants. CAC's own evaluators noted that project accountability was hampered by the board's reluctance to break away from grant decisions made in 1995. So even after Mr. Ayers's formal sway declined, the board largely adhered to the grant program he had put in place.
Mr. Ayers's defenders claim that he has redeemed himself with public-spirited education work. That claim is hard to swallow if you understand that he views his education work as an effort to stoke resistance to an oppressive American system. He likes to stress that he learned of his first teaching job while in jail for a draft-board sit-in. For Mr. Ayers, teaching and his 1960s radicalism are two sides of the same coin.
Mr. Ayers is the founder of the "small schools" movement (heavily funded by CAC), in which individual schools built around specific political themes push students to "confront issues of inequity, war, and violence." He believes teacher education programs should serve as "sites of resistance" to an oppressive system. (His teacher-training programs were also CAC funded.) The point, says Mr. Ayers in his "Teaching Toward Freedom," is to "teach against oppression," against America's history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.
The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming "guilt by association." Yet the issue here isn't guilt by association; it's guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.
Mr. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122212856075765367.html
.
Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools
By Stanley Kurtz - September 23, 2008
Despite having authored two autobiographies, Barack Obama has never written about his most important executive experience. From 1995 to 1999, he led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists.
The CAC was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s. Among other feats, Mr. Ayers and his cohorts bombed the Pentagon, and he has never expressed regret for his actions. Barack Obama's first run for the Illinois State Senate was launched at a 1995 gathering at Mr. Ayers's home.
The Obama campaign has struggled to downplay that association. Last April, Sen. Obama dismissed Mr. Ayers as just "a guy who lives in my neighborhood," and "not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis." Yet documents in the CAC archives make clear that Mr. Ayers and Mr. Obama were partners in the CAC. Those archives are housed in the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago and I've recently spent days looking through them.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was created ostensibly to improve Chicago's public schools. The funding came from a national education initiative by Ambassador Walter Annenberg. In early 1995, Mr. Obama was appointed the first chairman of the board, which handled fiscal matters. Mr. Ayers co-chaired the foundation's other key body, the "Collaborative," which shaped education policy.
The CAC's basic functioning has long been known, because its annual reports, evaluations and some board minutes were public. But the Daley archive contains additional board minutes, the Collaborative minutes, and documentation on the groups that CAC funded and rejected. The Daley archives show that Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda.
One unsettled question is how Mr. Obama, a former community organizer fresh out of law school, could vault to the top of a new foundation? In response to my questions, the Obama campaign issued a statement saying that Mr. Ayers had nothing to do with Obama's "recruitment" to the board. The statement says Deborah Leff and Patricia Albjerg Graham (presidents of other foundations) recruited him. Yet the archives show that, along with Ms. Leff and Ms. Graham, Mr. Ayers was one of a working group of five who assembled the initial board in 1994. Mr. Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval.
The CAC's agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers's educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism. In the mid-1960s, Mr. Ayers taught at a radical alternative school, and served as a community organizer in Cleveland's ghetto.
In works like "City Kids, City Teachers" and "Teaching the Personal and the Political," Mr. Ayers wrote that teachers should be community organizers dedicated to provoking resistance to American racism and oppression. His preferred alternative? "I'm a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist," Mr. Ayers said in an interview in Ron Chepesiuk's, "Sixties Radicals," at about the same time Mr. Ayers was forming CAC.
CAC translated Mr. Ayers's radicalism into practice. Instead of funding schools directly, it required schools to affiliate with "external partners," which actually got the money. Proposals from groups focused on math/science achievement were turned down. Instead CAC disbursed money through various far-left community organizers, such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (or Acorn).
Mr. Obama once conducted "leadership training" seminars with Acorn, and Acorn members also served as volunteers in Mr. Obama's early campaigns. External partners like the South Shore African Village Collaborative and the Dual Language Exchange focused more on political consciousness, Afrocentricity and bilingualism than traditional education. CAC's in-house evaluators comprehensively studied the effects of its grants on the test scores of Chicago public-school students. They found no evidence of educational improvement.
CAC also funded programs designed to promote "leadership" among parents. Ostensibly this was to enable parents to advocate on behalf of their children's education. In practice, it meant funding Mr. Obama's alma mater, the Developing Communities Project, to recruit parents to its overall political agenda. CAC records show that board member Arnold Weber was concerned that parents "organized" by community groups might be viewed by school principals "as a political threat." Mr. Obama arranged meetings with the Collaborative to smooth out Mr. Weber's objections.
The Daley documents show that Mr. Ayers sat as an ex-officio member of the board Mr. Obama chaired through CAC's first year. He also served on the board's governance committee with Mr. Obama, and worked with him to craft CAC bylaws. Mr. Ayers made presentations to board meetings chaired by Mr. Obama. Mr. Ayers spoke for the Collaborative before the board. Likewise, Mr. Obama periodically spoke for the board at meetings of the Collaborative.
The Obama campaign notes that Mr. Ayers attended only six board meetings, and stresses that the Collaborative lost its "operational role" at CAC after the first year. Yet the Collaborative was demoted to a strictly advisory role largely because of ethical concerns, since the projects of Collaborative members were receiving grants. CAC's own evaluators noted that project accountability was hampered by the board's reluctance to break away from grant decisions made in 1995. So even after Mr. Ayers's formal sway declined, the board largely adhered to the grant program he had put in place.
Mr. Ayers's defenders claim that he has redeemed himself with public-spirited education work. That claim is hard to swallow if you understand that he views his education work as an effort to stoke resistance to an oppressive American system. He likes to stress that he learned of his first teaching job while in jail for a draft-board sit-in. For Mr. Ayers, teaching and his 1960s radicalism are two sides of the same coin.
Mr. Ayers is the founder of the "small schools" movement (heavily funded by CAC), in which individual schools built around specific political themes push students to "confront issues of inequity, war, and violence." He believes teacher education programs should serve as "sites of resistance" to an oppressive system. (His teacher-training programs were also CAC funded.) The point, says Mr. Ayers in his "Teaching Toward Freedom," is to "teach against oppression," against America's history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.
The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming "guilt by association." Yet the issue here isn't guilt by association; it's guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.
Mr. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122212856075765367.html
.
Sort By:
Raves
|
Date
-
raves +1 posted Sep 25, 2008 10:30AM GMT
reply
This is why he is offering the early education .He wants to train all your children to be little terrorists. -
raves +1 Sep 26, 2008 04:04AM GMT (edited)That's how the communists tried doing it... early indoctrination towards creating the 'new Soviet man'.
"It's time to take a closer look at the well-tested tactics used by Communist regimes to alter minds and create "the new Soviet man," for it's happening here. Once the international system is fully in place, neither we nor our children will remain free from socialist indoctrination and unthinkable controls. It's all part of Goals 2000, the school-to-work legislation, and the process of "lifelong learning" which is essential for building the planned "sustainable communities" around the world."
http://www.crossroad.to/Quote... -
raves +2 posted Sep 24, 2008 10:09PM GMTI saw Mr. Kurtz on Fox news. Finally, someone is really looking in the Ayers thing. Amazing that there are herds of reporters and investigators in Alaska, and only one digging into Obama's past!
Sameful... -
raves +3 posted Sep 24, 2008 06:45PM GMTThe article is very informative, Heart. It is so frustrating that the Obamanites do not even look at the negatives about Obama. I had one friend, an Obama supporter tell me what a great lawyer Obama is and had his ten-year at the University. . I thought to myself, "Why was he just a lecturer at that University then?" I had to silently laugh. I did not want to start a fight with t my friend.
-
raves +2 Sep 24, 2008 11:18PM GMTA lecturer that did not lecture.
-
raves +2 posted Sep 24, 2008 06:40PM GMT
-
raves +5 posted Sep 24, 2008 06:04PM GMTObama is like a modern day Hitler, Chavez or Castro. This man has charisma, and promise change, but change to what? He can't be trusted. He lies too much. Pepole follow Obama because they are weak minded & desperate for change..... just like people who followed Chavez, Hitler & Castro, but we all know how all that turned out.
I can not trust Obama, I can not believe in his idea of change. If we live in the greatest country in the world, then why does Obaba want to change it?
I am voting for McCain/Palin, who I feel will truly bring what we Americans all need. Strong leadership, Good Morals & Values & a Balanced Budget. -
raves +6 posted Sep 24, 2008 11:32AM GMT (edited)moderated...
-
raves +7 posted Sep 24, 2008 11:18AM GMTToo liberal.
-
raves +6 Sep 24, 2008 04:28PM GMTToo scary for this country, it would be easier for his uprising in Tibet, he should have started there.
-
raves +8 posted Sep 24, 2008 10:25AM GMTWe are all guilty by association. I can tell a lot about you by the friends you have, Obama is not the man for the job. Anybody but Obama. The polls claim he is leading, but the polls have been dead wrong before.
Time to send Obama packing to Kenya, where he is a citizen. Let him convert them to communism.
-
raves +8 posted Sep 24, 2008 06:30AM GMTI have known this for a long time .. where are all the obama people ? Guess they can't defend him on this. LOL
-
raves +3 Sep 24, 2008 06:13PM GMTThey've been remarkably silent on a *lot* of issues lately; on SH and across the blogosphere. About the only enthusiasm I see lately is their ongoing 'seek and destroy' pogrom against Palin.
-
raves +2 Sep 24, 2008 07:24PM GMTTotaly agree, I have not seen this in a while and the debates are going to be delayed. I guess we are in bad shape and the damn democrats in congress are holding us up! You cannot tell me out of all the advisers in the world they can not come up with something.
-
raves +7 posted Sep 24, 2008 05:02AM GMT (edited)All I have to say is we live in a very different America today, an America that has a large population of people residing in her that just do not care who is running for the highest office in our land, a people who place no importance on the character of a person running for president, a person who will be privvy to so many top secret documents, and events occurring in the world, because these people have become so dependent on daddy government to take care of them from cradle to grave that they don't give a care who is in office as long as they get as many freebies as will be promised to them by their candidate Obama, progressive socialist liberalism is destroying this country!
-
raves +3 Sep 24, 2008 04:29PM GMTIt's all about the party. Flood America with liberals and ACORN is finding their way.
-
raves +10 posted Sep 24, 2008 04:35AM GMTThe "elephant in the room" question is why are so many Americans supporting obama? What has happened to America that would result in an obama candidacy? It is insanity.
-
raves +6 Sep 24, 2008 04:36PM GMT (edited)The liberals got the vote out "in your face" Chicago style, been working on it for years now, infiltrating every major cities poor area's first, then grew outward, they didn't get to you Robert, They used people with no credit or enough education with the promise of purchasing a home loan with no money down. False college credits promised and the list goes on and on, all to vote democrat.
Many who lost their homes can thank the liberal push to be a liberal democrat, even got below minimum wage for helping to get the vote out, if they got paid at all.
Its called the trickle up effect and Blow Your Mama received hundreds of thousands by Freddie and Fannie for his campaign. How is that? Still needs to be answered but is well hidden by ACORN....... -
raves +10 posted Sep 24, 2008 04:31AM GMTThis is scary and it absolutely shows why we must unite and vote for the future and love for this country. McCain/Palin 08
-
raves +9 posted Sep 24, 2008 03:35AM GMTOkay. Let's just all of us say it and get it over with. Obama is anti-American. His words and deeds are proof in the pudding. He won't respect the flag as an American. He has worked closely with and socialized with an anti-American terrorist, William Ayers. He has chaired an organization with a Palestinian terrorist sympathizer, Rashid Khalidi. His sugardaddy is anti-Israel and anti-American mogul George Soros. His economic plan is Socialist, thus anti-American. He was the member of a hate-filled church which in this melting pot known as these United States is, you know it, anti-American. His birth certificate is in question, so we don't know if he is, indeed, an American! It looks like when it comes to Barack Obama, we'd be hard-pressed to find anything American!!
Archives



