THE TRUE FACTS ABOUT THE LIAR PALIN
Did you watch Sarah Palin's speech last night? The speech told us a lot about her.
It told us that she can distort the facts and deliver mean-spirited zingers with the best of them. It told us that if RushLimbaugh or Ann Coulter ever need a stand-in, she'd be a great pick.
It told us that she can be condescending and dismissive of the real work Barack Obama did helping real people on the SouthSide of Chicago. It told us that she can uphold the long Republican tradition of lying about Democratic tax cuts—eventhough Obama's plan would give Americans a bigger break than McCain's.
But the speech—written by one of President Bush's speechwriters—didn't tell us the truth about Sarah Palin'sextremist positions. And the more that people know her far-right views, the less they support her. (There's a partiallist below.)
One of the best ways to get the word out about Palin is to write a letter to the editor of your local paper. Today's a greatday to write because this is very relevant—it just happened last night. Plus, our online tool makes it easy and hasgreat tips. Please take a few minutes to write a quick letter to the editor now:
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=95&id=13709-8667213-WiW...
Palin's speech and the reaction to it also made clear why McCain picked her. It wasn't a decision about who's most qualifiedto serve a heart-beat away from the presidency—it was a political decision about pleasing the far-right base of theRepublican party.
Writing a letter to your local paper is a great way to make sure voters understand that. The opinion pages are the most widely-readpages of the newspaper. Write today, and your letter's a lot more likely to get published because it's so topical. It'llhelp sway the editorial board too.
Here are a bunch of points you might want to include in your letter:
Palin recently said that the war in Iraq is "God's task." She's even admitted she hasn't thoughtabout the war much—just last year she was quoted saying, "I've been so focused on state government, I haven'treally focused much on the war in Iraq." 1, 2
Palin has actively sought the support of the fringe Alaska Independence Party. Six months ago, Palin toldmembers of the group—who advocate for a vote on secession from the union—to "keep up the good work"and "wished the party luck on what she called its 'inspiring convention.'" 3
Palin wants to teach creationism in public schools. She hasn't made clear whether she thinks evolutionis a fact.4
Palin doesn't believe that humans contribute to global warming. Speaking about climate change, she said,"I'm not one though who would attribute it to being manmade." 5
Palin has close ties to Big Oil. Her inauguration was even sponsored by BP. 6
Palin is extremely anti-choice. She doesn't even support abortion in the case of rape or incest. 7
Palin opposes comprehensive sex-ed in public schools. She's said she will only support abstinence-onlyapproaches. 8
As mayor, Palin tried to ban books from the library. Palin asked the library how she might go about banningbooks because some had inappropriate language in them—shocking the librarian, Mary Ellen Baker. According to Time, "news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire Baker fornot giving "full support" to the mayor." 9
She DID support the Bridge to Nowhere (before she opposed it). Palin claimed that she said "thanks,but no thanks" to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere. But in 2006, Palin supported the project repeatedly, saying thatAlaska should take advantage of earmarks "while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."10
The plain fact of the matter is that Sarah Palin did a bang-up job delivering a Karl Rove-style political attack speechlast night. That makes her a skilled politician but it doesn't make her views any more palatable for voters. Americans don'treally want another far-right, anti-science ideologue in the White House.
Please help get the word out about where Sarah Palin really stands on the issues.
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=95&id=13709-8667213-WiW...
It told us that she can distort the facts and deliver mean-spirited zingers with the best of them. It told us that if RushLimbaugh or Ann Coulter ever need a stand-in, she'd be a great pick.
It told us that she can be condescending and dismissive of the real work Barack Obama did helping real people on the SouthSide of Chicago. It told us that she can uphold the long Republican tradition of lying about Democratic tax cuts—eventhough Obama's plan would give Americans a bigger break than McCain's.
But the speech—written by one of President Bush's speechwriters—didn't tell us the truth about Sarah Palin'sextremist positions. And the more that people know her far-right views, the less they support her. (There's a partiallist below.)
One of the best ways to get the word out about Palin is to write a letter to the editor of your local paper. Today's a greatday to write because this is very relevant—it just happened last night. Plus, our online tool makes it easy and hasgreat tips. Please take a few minutes to write a quick letter to the editor now:
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=95&id=13709-8667213-WiW...
Palin's speech and the reaction to it also made clear why McCain picked her. It wasn't a decision about who's most qualifiedto serve a heart-beat away from the presidency—it was a political decision about pleasing the far-right base of theRepublican party.
Writing a letter to your local paper is a great way to make sure voters understand that. The opinion pages are the most widely-readpages of the newspaper. Write today, and your letter's a lot more likely to get published because it's so topical. It'llhelp sway the editorial board too.
Here are a bunch of points you might want to include in your letter:
Palin recently said that the war in Iraq is "God's task." She's even admitted she hasn't thoughtabout the war much—just last year she was quoted saying, "I've been so focused on state government, I haven'treally focused much on the war in Iraq." 1, 2
Palin has actively sought the support of the fringe Alaska Independence Party. Six months ago, Palin toldmembers of the group—who advocate for a vote on secession from the union—to "keep up the good work"and "wished the party luck on what she called its 'inspiring convention.'" 3
Palin wants to teach creationism in public schools. She hasn't made clear whether she thinks evolutionis a fact.4
Palin doesn't believe that humans contribute to global warming. Speaking about climate change, she said,"I'm not one though who would attribute it to being manmade." 5
Palin has close ties to Big Oil. Her inauguration was even sponsored by BP. 6
Palin is extremely anti-choice. She doesn't even support abortion in the case of rape or incest. 7
Palin opposes comprehensive sex-ed in public schools. She's said she will only support abstinence-onlyapproaches. 8
As mayor, Palin tried to ban books from the library. Palin asked the library how she might go about banningbooks because some had inappropriate language in them—shocking the librarian, Mary Ellen Baker. According to Time, "news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire Baker fornot giving "full support" to the mayor." 9
She DID support the Bridge to Nowhere (before she opposed it). Palin claimed that she said "thanks,but no thanks" to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere. But in 2006, Palin supported the project repeatedly, saying thatAlaska should take advantage of earmarks "while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."10
The plain fact of the matter is that Sarah Palin did a bang-up job delivering a Karl Rove-style political attack speechlast night. That makes her a skilled politician but it doesn't make her views any more palatable for voters. Americans don'treally want another far-right, anti-science ideologue in the White House.
Please help get the word out about where Sarah Palin really stands on the issues.
http://pol.moveon.org/lte?campaign_id=95&id=13709-8667213-WiW...
Comments
Sort By:
Raves
|
Date
-
raves +2 posted Sep 05, 2008 07:49PM GMT
reply
And why would anyone in their right mind go to the slanted left Move On .org..Actually there are afew new sites that Soros and his Bilderberg Friends have set up...What is wrong with a strong person that knows her mind and isn't afraid to speak it... I doth think the Libs protest too much...LoL -
raves Sep 05, 2008 08:50PM GMT (edited)bilderberg is a neocon new world order organization and the opposite of Soros. get your facts straight.
nielsen, totally unreliable, totally neocon. get your information from an organization which has no stake in the elections. do you know who owns nielsen? guess not.
The Dutch publishing company VNU acquired Nielsen Media Research in 1999.[12] It later recombined the two halves of the business when it acquired AC Nielsen in 2001.
VNU combined the Nielsen properties with other research and data collection units including BASES, Claritas, HCI and Spectra. The company’s publishing arm also owned several publications including The Hollywood Reporter and Billboard magazine.
In 2006, VNU was acquired by a group of six private equity firms which included Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P., Blackstone Group L.P., Carlyle Group, Hellman & Friedman LLC and AlpInvest Partners.[13] In the same year, the group hired David L. Calhoun, formerly of General Electric, as CEO.[14] He renamed VNU as The Nielsen Company in 2007.
RECOGNIZE THE CARLYLE GROUP? -
raves Sep 05, 2008 09:41PM GMTlol Ever get tired of c&p'ing the same old pointless crap over and over? roflol
-
raves +1 -1 posted Sep 05, 2008 06:01PM GMTI won’t buy a car form her or him.
-
raves Sep 05, 2008 06:18PM GMTtoo right!! even moderate conservatives agree with us. they won't say, but they will vote, for the other side. " drill here, drill now i am a pow my friends... (weird cramped grin)" and annie oakley: just a bit over the top for even republicans. did you see how little attention was paid to the convention?
electrifying? my arse! -
raves Sep 05, 2008 08:32PM GMTRight. lmao - http://sodahead.com/blog/14038/
http://blog.nielsen.com/niels...
McCain Tops Obama’s Record-Breaking Ratings
September 5, 2008
On Thursday night, John McCain’s acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention bested Barack Obama’s record-breaking viewership numbers from last week by 500,000 viewers.
More than 38.9 million people tuned in to coverage of the final night of the GOP convention. In comparison, Obama’s acceptance speech at the Democratic convention drew 38.4 million viewers. -
raves Sep 05, 2008 08:48PM GMT (edited)lies it was 500,000 LESS but the repugs, as usual spun it again.
In his nomination acceptance speech last night, Senator John McCain said, "We believe in a government ... that doesn't make your choices for you, but works to make sure you have more choices to make for yourself."
But John McCain has spent his career removing women's right to choose! >>
This comes as a surprise to those following the Republican convention, where neither he nor vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin admitted their anti-choice beliefs to the American public.
Indeed, McCain's anti-choice policies come as a surprise to many of his supporters. A recent poll says half of all female McCain supporters are pro-choice, and more than 70 percent of those incorrectly believe McCain is, too.
Throughout his service in the Senate, however, McCain has repeatedly voted to slash funding for low-income family-planning programs, against allowing women to obtain birth control and to take away women's right to choose.
Palin's record is no better, as she vehemently opposes abortion and used her line-item veto to eliminate funding for a program that would help pregnant teenagers in Alaska.
Shed light on McCain's anti-choice record >>
http://www.thepetitionsite.co... -
raves Sep 05, 2008 09:23PM GMT>> lies it was 500,000 LESS but the repugs, as usual spun it again.
Argue with Neilsen ratings. Those are their numbers; I tend to believe them over you. If you have *genuine* cites or sources (reputable please) for other numbers please... provide the link. -
raves Sep 05, 2008 09:37PM GMT
-
raves Sep 06, 2008 06:52AM GMTyou ->> lies it was 500,000 LESS but the repugs, as usual spun it again.
me ->> If you have *genuine* cites or sources (reputable please) for other numbers please... provide the link.
I didn't ask for info about VNU... but hey, if you want to avoid the issue so be it. -
raves Sep 05, 2008 09:05PM GMTnielsen, totally unreliable, totally neocon. get your information from an organization which has no stake in the elections. do you know who owns nielsen? guess not.
The Dutch publishing company VNU acquired Nielsen Media Research in 1999.[12] It later recombined the two halves of the business when it acquired AC Nielsen in 2001.
VNU combined the Nielsen properties with other research and data collection units including BASES, Claritas, HCI and Spectra. The company’s publishing arm also owned several publications including The Hollywood Reporter and Billboard magazine.
In 2006, VNU was acquired by a group of six private equity firms which included Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P., Blackstone Group L.P., Carlyle Group, Hellman & Friedman LLC and AlpInvest Partners.[13] In the same year, the group hired David L. Calhoun, formerly of General Electric, as CEO.[14] He renamed VNU as The Nielsen Company in 2007.
RECOGNIZE THE CARLYLE GROUP?
FOOL! -
raves Sep 05, 2008 09:34PM GMTFool? Bite me bitch.
Nielsen ratings are accepted as being the primary and most accurate measure of viewer numbers. Sorry is that messes with your little world of blind adulation. Get over it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"Nielsen Ratings are audience measurement systems developed by Nielsen Media Research to determine the audience size and composition of television programming. Nielsen conducts these tests by calling the locals and asking them what they are watching at the moment. Nielsen operates in over 100 countries and was founded in 1923.
The system has been updated and modified extensively since it was developed in the early 1940s by Arthur Nielsen. It has since been the primary source of audience measurement information in the television industry around the world."
Oh and Palin's numbers were updated to include PBS. And that's from the Obama network... MSNBS! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/2...
"PBS estimated its audience at 3.9 million, based on a less reliable sample of several big cities. Nielsen does not count the audience for C-SPAN, which also showed the speech."
So... as many as Obama's speech! LOL
Now... you're still looking foolish!!! -
raves Sep 06, 2008 07:41PM GMT
-
raves Sep 07, 2008 04:42AM GMTNo. Not at all. You don't have what it takes to do that! =)
